Habeas corpus petition by a father seeking custody of the corpus. The State's report showed the corpus had been recovered and voluntarily wished to go with her father. The petition was disposed of since custody was already with the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JD:3864-DB]
[HC-1/2025]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 1/2025
Padam Singh S/o Mal Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Suliya Khera, Kalaliya, Police Station Sendra, District Beawar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Gurjar, GA cum AAG a/w Mr. Ashutosh Sharma
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
21/01/2025
This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking custody of the corpus.
Learned GA cum AAG has submitted a report dated 20.01.2025 which shows that the corpus has been recovered and her statement was recorded before the police authority, in which she has expressed her voluntary wish to go with her father, who is the present petitioner.
The report dated 20.01.2025 is taken on record.
[2025:RJ-JD:3864-DB]
[HC-1/2025]
(2 of 2)
In view of the above, the present habeas corpus petition is disposed of, as the custody of the corpus is already with the petitioner.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
7-Sudheer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the corpus could be produced and custody given to the petitioner father.
Padam Singh
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Home
The Superintendent Of Police, Beawar
The Station House Officer, Police Station Sendrara
Mukesh Singh
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
