Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that a subsequent development rendered it infructuous. Pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:40952]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7620/2003
Gangapur Krai Vikrai Sahakari
----Petitioner
Versus
Appellate Authority Under Paym
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Mishra For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
08/10/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that in view of the subsequent development in the matter, the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
SAURABH /32
Gangapur Krai Vikrai Sahakari
Appellate Authority Under Paym
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
