Writ petition challenging RIICO action concerning industrial Plot No.G1-136 at Chopanki. During pendency, RIICO cancelled the allotment by order dated 24.06.2024, rendering the petition infructuous. The court dismissed it as infructuous with liberty to challenge the cancellation order before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:20092]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6535/2014
M/s Suman Enterprises Through Proprietor Smt Suman Lata, Wife Of Sh. Lakho Mal, 66 B/c-2B, Janak Puri, New Delhi - 58.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr.R. M. Bairwa for Mr.M. K. Jain |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr.Sandeep Taneja, AAG with Mr.Aditya Sharma |
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
13/05/2025
Declare the Annexures 2 and 3 illegal, quashed and set aside, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner, if during the pendency of the writ petition, by coercive action of the Respondent, petitioner is dispossed from the industry/ industrial Plot No.G1-136 at
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:20092]
[CW-6535/2014]
Chopanki, possession of the same may be restored to him.
Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deem just and proper be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Aayush Sharma /38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether relief could still be granted when the plot allotment had already been cancelled during the petition's pendency?
M/s Suman Enterprises through Proprietor Smt Suman Lata
Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation Ltd.
Regional Manager, RIICO Ltd., Bhiwadi Unit II
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
