Civil writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel for petitioners submitted that subsequent developments had rendered the petition pointless. No substantive adjudication; pending applications disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:47145]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6401/2023
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. |
Barsha Kumari for |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. | Manju Jain | |
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order
21/11/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of subsequent development, the present petition has become infructuous.
Considering the submissions so advanced, instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
SOURAV /9
M/s. Rajasthan Marble Minerals through legal heirs of Komalchand Patni
Kailash Chand Patni
Anil Kumar Jain
Arun Kumar Jain
Smt. Vimla Jain
Maneesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
