Nabkri Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Nabkri Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Directions to the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation in light of the order dated 09.04.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3320/2025; interim protection (per Appellate Tribunal order) continued for six weeks; stay application and all pending applications disposed of.

Issue for consideration

Whether the respondents should be directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner.

Court's answer

On the statements of learned counsel for both sides, the writ petition is disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation in light of the order dated 09.04.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3320/2025.

Ratio / Principle

The Court expressly did not issue any direction to decide the representation in a particular way; the respondents are at liberty to decide it strictly in accordance with law.

Key takeaways

The interim protection awarded to the petitioner as per the order of the Appellate Tribunal shall continue for a further period of six weeks.ratio¶¶25

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench — S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5904/2025 (Nabkri Developers Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.), decided 02/05/2025 by Anoop Kumar Dhand, J. On a limited prayer, and on counsel for the respondents admitting the factual position, the writ petition seeking directions to the Directorate of Enforcement respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation was disposed of: the respondents were directed to decide the representation in light of the order dated 09.04.2025 passed by this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3320/2025. The Court clarified that it did not issue any direction to decide the representation in a particular way, leaving the respondents free to decide strictly in accordance with law. The interim protection earlier awarded to the petitioner by the Appellate Tribunal was continued for a further six weeks. The stay application and all pending applications stood disposed of.

[2025:RJ-JP:18584]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5904/2025

Nabkri Developers Pvt Ltd, Having Its Registered Office At Ff-16 Cross River Mall Shahdra Delhi 110032 Through Its Director Mr. Anand Mittal R/o Krishna Kutir Amai Road, Kotputli, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

Union Of India, Through Director, Directorate Of Enforcement (Ed), Department Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance, North Block, New Delhi.

The Director, Directorate Of Enforcement (Ed), Government Of India, Zonal Office, 2Nd Floor, Jeevan Nidhi - Ii, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur 302005 (Raj.)

The Deputy Director, Directorate Of Enforcement (Ed), Government Of India, Zonal Office, 2Nd Floor, Jeevan Nidhi - Ii, Lic Building, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur 302005 (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ayush Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Bharadwaj for Mr. Rajat Sharma

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

02/05/2025

A limited prayer has been made by learned counsel for the petitioner for issuing directions to the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition be disposed of by issuing similar directions passed by this

[2025:RJ-JP:18584]

[CW-5904/2025]

(2 of 2)

Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3320/2025 vide order dated 09.04.2025.

Learned counsel for the respondents admits the above factual aspect of the matter.

Considering the above statement made by learned counsels for the respective parties, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing directions to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in light of the order dated 09.04.2025 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3320/2025.

Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.

It goes without saying that this Court has not issued any direction to the respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.

For a period of further six weeks, the interim protection awarded to the petitioner, as per the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, shall continue.

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

Karan/20