A plaintiff whose suit evidence had been closed sought to challenge a civil court's rejection of her Section 151 CPC application for another chance to present evidence. Reviewing the trial court's reasoning, the High Court found no illegality or perversity and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:17138]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5889/2025
Smt. Maya Devi W/o Shri Laxminarayan, R/o Plot No. D-29, Model Town, D-Block, Jagatpura, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Jh Qjt gqlSu For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
23-04-2025
;kph@oknh dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds vUrxZr fopkj.k U;k;ky; flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ,oa U;kf;d eftLVªsV ¼nf{k.k½ t;iqj egkuxj] t;iqj }kjk nhokuh nkok la[;k&122@2015] ek;k nsoh cuke jkeizdk'k esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 03-04-2025 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds vuqlkj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;kph@oknh dh vksj ls fnukad 17-01-2025 dks izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 151 lh-ih-lh- fujLr fd;k x;k gS A
lquk x;k A
;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph@oknh dk fuosnu gS fd oknh;k e/;izns'k esa fuokl djrh gS ,slh fLFkfr esa og xokg izLrqr ugha dj ldh vr% okfn;k dks viuk okn lkfcr djus gsrq xokg izLrqr djus ckcr~ ,d volj iznku
[2025:RJ-JP:17138]
[CW-5889/2025]
(2 of 2)
fd;k tkos A mudk fuosnu gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vkns'k fnukad 17-01-2025 fof/k vuq:i ugha gksus ds dkj.k vikLr fd;k tkosA mUgksaus vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd, gSa%&
1- 2021¼0½lqizhe¼jkt-½ 1588]pSu flag cuke lcy flag o vU; 2- 1998¼0½lqizhe¼jkt½577]vkseizdk'k o vU; cuke jkenRr o vU; geus ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph }kjk izLrqr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k o izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk voyksdu fd;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 03-04-2025 ds voyksdu ls izdV gS fd okni= o"kZ 2015 esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gS A fnukad 03-12-2016 dks okn esa fook|d fojfpr fd, x, gSa A oknh dks lk{; izLrqr djus gsrq dbZ volj fn, x, gS A oknh dks nks ckj gtsZ ij Hkh lk{; izLrqr djus dk volj fn;k x;k gS ijUrq oknh dh vksj ls U;k;ky; ds vkns'kkuqlkj gtkZ Hkh tek ugha djok;k x;k gS A fnukad 30-10-2019 dks U;k;ky; }kjk oknh dh lk{; can dh xbZ gS rRi'pkr~ oknh }kjk fnukad 17-01-2025 dks yxHkx pkj o"kZ i'pkr~ /kkjk 151 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj lk{; dk volj pkgk x;k gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ls izdV gS fd oknh dks i;kZIr volj ls Hkh vf/kd volj lk{; izLrqr djus gsrq iznku fd, tk pqds gSa A fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk leLr rF;ksa dk foospu djrs gq, ldkj.k vkns'k ikfjr dj ;kph@oknh dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k x;k gS] tks U;k;laxr ,oa mfpr gSA mDr vkns'k esa fdlh izdkj dh voS/krk ;k izfrdwyrk izdV ugha gq;h gS vr% Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 227 ds rgr iznRr lhfer {ks=kf/kdkj ds rgr mDr vkns'k esa gLr{ksi dh dksbZ xqatkbZ'k ugha gS A
ifj.kker% ;kph@oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gksus ls fujLr dh tkrh gS A
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Rishikesh Soni/51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's Section 151 CPC application seeking one more opportunity to produce evidence was unlawful and amenable to correction under supervisory jurisdict
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Chain Singh v. Sampat Singh and OthersReferred¶21
2021(0) Supreme (Raj) 1588
Om Prakash and Others v. Ram RattReferred¶21
1998(0) Supreme (Raj) 577
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Maya Devi
Ramprakash Rawat
Smt. Manju Rawat
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
