Writ petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending civil suit was disposed of after the trial court decided the suit, rendering the challenge infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:2903]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 48/2019
Rajrani Yadav W/o Dr. Bhupendra Singh Yadav, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 34, Alkapuri -A, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
21/01/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:2903]
[CW-48/2019]
(2 of 2)
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that trial court has decided the suit. So, the Civil Writ Petition challenging the interlocutory order has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /116
Rajrani Yadav
Pratap Singh
Ajit Singh
Raghuveer Sing
Smt. Chitra Singh
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
