Dismissed¶19

Teekam Chand Jeliya v. State of Raj and Ors.

Rajasthan HC25 Jul 2025CW/3585/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; counsel for petitioner pleads no instruction; respondents had submitted petition rendered infructuous on account of subsequent development; High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3585/2011; Teekam Chand Jeliya v. State of Rajasthan (Principal Secretary, Water Resources), Chief Engineer Water Resources Department, Shri Ghanshyam Goswami (Ferrowman, Kota Division); Justice Mahendar Kumar Goyal; order dated 25/07/2025; advocates Utkarsh Dubey, Saumil Sharma, Gopal Krishan Sharma AGC; neutral citation [2025:RJ-JP:28023]; no merits adjudication, no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

As learned counsel for the petitioner pleaded no instruction, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶19

Teekam Chand Jeliya Vs State of Raj and Ors. — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:28023]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3585/2011

¶4

Teekam Chand Jeliya S/o Late Shri Ramchandra Jeliya Aged about 53 years R/o 246 (T-8) Ambedkar Nagar Kunhari Kota

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan represented through Principal Secretary Department of Water Resources, Government of Rajasthan Government Secretariat Jaipur

¶8

Chief Engineer Water Resources Department Government of Rajasthan Jaipur

¶9

Shri Ghanshyam Goswami posted as Ferrowman, Kota Division, Water Resources Department Kota

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Utkarsh Dubey
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Saumil Sharma for
	Mr.	Gopal Krishan Sharma,AGC

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order

¶13

25/07/2025

¶14

On last date, i.e., 22.07.2025, following order was passed:-

¶15

“Learned counsel for the respondents submits that on account of subsequent development, this writ petition is rendered infructuous.

¶16

None appears for the petitioner even in second round to rebut the aforesaid statement. However, in the interest of justice, he is granted one more opportunity to do so.

¶17

List the matter on 25.07.2025 at top of the list.”

¶18

Today, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instruction.

¶19

In view thereof, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.

¶20

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶21

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶22

PRAGATI/16