“9. A bare look at the advertisement makes it abundantly clear that for award of bonus marks towards experience, a candidate was required to produce the certificates issued by the authorised officer in the proforma specified. The proforma specified was appended to the advertisement itself. It is not disputed before us that the certificates produced by the appellant were not in prescribed proforma. Further, as per Clause 8 of the advertisement, the certificate issued by the authorised officer was required to be verified by Joint Director of the concerned zone. Admittedly, the first certificate dated 13.03.2013 though issued by the competent officer i.e. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Pali, was not counter signed by the Joint Director. The certificate dated 23.01.2018 was issued by the Block Chief Medical Officer, Jaitaran, who was not even competent to issue the certificate and the same was also not counter signed/verified by the Joint Director of concerned zone. In this view of the matter, the action of the respondents in denying the bonus marks to the appellant on the basis of the certificates produced cannot be faulted with.
