The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a provisional attachment order dated 13.03.2024. The court held the petition to be infructuous as the respondent submitted that the order ceased to exist under Section 83(7) of the CGST Act, 2017.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:12333-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2801/2025
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka with Mr. Rohan Chattu For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vedant Agrawal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order
19/03/2025
“Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 takes notice and seeks time to inform the Court whether the attachment continues under the law or not.
List this case a week after next.”
(MANEESH SHARMA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Deepa/32
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the challenge to the provisional attachment order is maintainable in view of the respondent's submission that the order no longer exists.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Babu Lal S/o Shri Ram Gopal
Sri Ram Yadav S/o Shri Bhagwan Ram
Union Of India
State Of Rajasthan
Avneesh Jhingan
Maneesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
