Writ petition against Bank of Baroda not pressed on merits. Court disposed of it with liberty to file a representation; bank directed to decide it sympathetically within four weeks in accordance with law.
Liberty granted to file representation before respondent bank; bank directed to decide within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JD:7683]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2561/2025
Neeraj Gupta S/o Shri Manak Gupta, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Manak Mansion, Behind Brahmachari Mansion, Rani Bazar Bikaner.
----Petitioner
Versus
Bank Of Baroda, Through Its Authorized Officer, Registered Office At E-5-6, Kabir Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Kunal Bishnoi. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Ms. Anubha Singh,through VC. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
06/02/2025
[2025:RJ-JD:7683]
[CW-2561/2025]
(2 of 2)
file a representation before the respondent- Bank of Baroda, through its Authorized Officer, Registered Office At E-5-6, Kabir Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur for redressal of his grievances.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
344-Shahenshah/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file a representation to the respondent bank for redressal of his grievances.
Neeraj Gupta S/o Shri Manak Gupta
Bank Of Baroda, Through Its Authorized Officer, Registered Office At E-5-6, Kabir Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
