Disposed

Lalita Bairwa Wife of Shri Gajendra Singh Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Feb 2025CW/2089/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition over an unadjudicated grievance before the Women and Child Development Department; with counsel's consensus, the court disposed of the petition on the respondents' assurance that the petitioner's representation would be adjudicated within a fortnight of filing.

What did the court decide?

Respondents to adjudicate petitioner's representation within a fortnight from filing.

Lalita Bairwa Wife of Shri Gajendra Singh Bairwa Vs… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2089/2025

¶3

Lalita Bairwa Wife Of Shri Gajendra Singh Bairwa, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Gram Post Bhanakpura, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli (Rajasthan).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶7

Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Women And Child Development Department, Janpath, Gandhinagar, Jaipur.

¶8

Deputy Director, Women And Child Development Department, Karauli, Rajasthan.

¶9

Child Development Project Officer, Todabhim, Karauli, Rajasthan.

¶10

Secretary, Gram Panchayat Bhanakpura, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.M. Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶14

Judgment

¶15

10/02/2025

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that inspite of filing Annx.5 i.e. Legal Notice dated 10.01.2025, the respondents have not adjudicated the grievance of petitioner. Learned counsel has placed reliance upon judgement of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.

¶17

[CW-2089/2025]

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vu q -&1@2012).

¶20

Heard.

¶21

Let notices be issued to respondents.

¶22

On directions of Court, Mr. S.M. Sharma appearing for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG, accepts notice on behalf of respondentState.

¶23

Learned counsel for the respondents have made no objection and have ensured that the said representation shall be adjudicated within a period of fortnight from the date of filing of the same.

¶24

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel representing the parties and the consensus drawn inter-se between them, this court deems it appropriate to dispose of the present petition.

¶25

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Stay application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶26

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶27

HEENA/128

Lalita Bairwa Wife of Shri Gajendra Singh Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalita Bairwa Wife of Shri Gajendra Singh Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishan Pal Singh S/O Ganga Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Bulkesh Kumari D/O Shri Jagmal Singh W/O Kailash Kumar Poonia Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Kumar Verma S/O Shri Karta Ram Vs the State of Rajasthan

Himanshu Vs State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.

Pokar Ram Son of Shri Jagdish Prasad Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

Yash Choudhary Son of Shri Satyanarayan Choudhary Vs Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited