The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging Income Tax actions. The respondent counsel submitted that the department decided not to proceed due to the amount involved. The court disposed of the petition without further deliberation.
Writ petition disposed of on the submission of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:15283-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 208/2022
Ram Bhajan Yadav S/o Shri Ram Karan Yadav, aged 40 years, r/o Village Kandarpura, Post Shyosingpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 7(2) New Central Revenue Building, Janpath, Jaipur.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Raghavendra Singh Khichi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Sandeep Pathak with |
| Ms. Jaya P. Pathak |
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
04/04/2025
(ANAND SHARMA),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
RAJAT/PCG/18
Ram Bhajan Yadav
Income Tax Officer Ward 7(2)
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
