support of their defence, which reveals that the inspection conducted by the inspecting team was genuine and perfect and on the basis of the same and considering the reply to the show cause notice, the order impugned has been passed by the CBSE, which requires no interference of this Court and lastly, counsel argued that as per Clause 13.10 of the Bye-laws, 2018, the school may send a representation against the order of the Board imposing any kind of penalty and in case, such representation is submitted by the school authorities, the same would be decided by the Board, after affording them opportunity of hearing. But, in the instant case, without availing the alternative remedy, all the petitionerSchools have been approached this Court straightway, hence, on this count alone, the writ petitions are liable to be rejected and the petitioners-Schools may be relegated to avail the remedy of filing representations before the Board. 7. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 8. Perusal of the record as well as the arguments raised by counsel for the rival sides indicate that several versions and cross versions have been made against the sudden inspections conducted by the CBSE inspecting team. This Court is not going into the matter to the extent of examining the correctness of the allegations and the defence taken by the school authorities. Looking to the provisions contained under Clause 13.10, of the Bye-laws, 2018, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of all these writ petitions by granting liberty to the petitionersschools to approach the CBSE by way of filing representations along with all the documents available with them in their defence.
