Dismissed¶22

M/S Trishul Asphalt Products v. Deputy Commissioner

Rajasthan HC8 Apr 2025CW/15665/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Trishul Asphalt Products vs Deputy Commissioner SGST Bharatpur & others; D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15665/2022; Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench); Division Bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Anand Sharma; order dated 08/04/2025; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request in view of subsequent developments; liberty reserved to file fresh petition; no merits, statutes or precedents dealt with.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file fresh petition if eventuality so arises ¶22

M/S Trishul Asphalt Products Vs Deputy Commissioner — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:15682-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15665/2022

¶4

M/s Trishul Asphalt Products, Registered Office At Jai Foundrari Works, Behind Of Pani Ki Tanki, Old Industrial Area, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, 321001 Rajasthan, Through Its Proprietor, Shri Rahul Sharma S/o Shri Adesh Kumar Aged 27 Years R/o 1325 Abdul Nabepur Daingra Mathura Up 281001.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Deputy Commissioner, Circle-B, Rajasthan State Goods And Service Tax Department Bharatpur, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321001

¶8

Assistant Commissioner Circle-B, Rajasthan State Goods And Service Tax Department Bharatpur, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321001

¶9

The Commissioner, Rajasthan State Goods And Service Tax Department, Kar Bhawan Bhawani Singh Road C Scheme, Jaipur- 302005.

¶10

The Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, Room No. 46, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001, Through Its Secretary.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mohd. Bilal Mansuri Advocate through VC
For Respondent(s)	: Ms. Kinjal Surana Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Taneja, Additional
	Advocate General

¶13

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA

¶14

Order

¶15

08/04/2025

¶16

Heard.

¶17

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of subsequent developments, the petitioner, at

¶18

[CW-15665/2022]

¶19

[2025:RJ-JP:15682-DB]

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

this stage, does not wish to press this petition and seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to file fresh petition.

¶22

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition if eventuality so arises.

¶23

(ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ

¶24

Sanjay Kumawat/Daksh-28

M/S Trishul Asphalt Products v. Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Trishul Asphalt Products v. Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Katara Vs the State of Rajasthan

State of Rajasthan Vs Kedarnath Sharma S/O Shri Ramji Lal Sharma (at Present Teacher Terminated)

Bhanwar Singh Hada S/O Shri Mahendra Singh Hada Vs State of Rajasthan

Union of India Vs No. 2648428 Ex- Hav and Hony Nb/Sub Raghbir Singh S/O Shri Norang Ram

Kamal Khandelwal (Ay 2018-19) S/O Shri Amba Prasad Khandelwal Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Office of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

M/S Radiant Digitek Network Ltd. and Others Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, (Tds)