the wife of his fellow Constable, but also the other witnesses, namely, A. S. Durrani, M.R. Chandran, Usha Sethi, K.R.V. Nair, V.M. Melar Sethi, L Suresh, Girdhari Lal, Sunil Kumar Yadav & Prabhu Singh Meena, were recorded and an opportunity of crossexamination was also afforded to the petitioner and after conclusion of the enquiry, the guilt of the petitioner was found to be proved and thereafter, the matter was sent to the Disciplinary Authority who has taken a decision to terminate the petitioner from service. Counsel submits that copy of the Enquiry Report was supplied to the petitioner before passing the order impugned. Counsel submits that the petitioner has submitted a delayed appeal after a lapse of more than three years from the date of passing of the order impugned, however, the appeal was also rejected by the Appellate Authority by passing a reasoned and cogent order dated 27.09.2012, which requires no interference by this Court. Counsel submits that no perversity whatsoever in the departmental enquiry has been pointed out by the petitioner, hence, under these circumstances, this Court cannot act as a reviewing authority, to re-appreciate the evidence recorded during the disciplinary proceedings.
