Dr. Balkrishna Sharma Son of Shri Ganesh Narayan Sharma v. State of Rajasthan
Retirement age – Ayurved Department doctors
Case brief
What is this about?
Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (D.B.); retirement age 62 years; premature retirement before 62; notional benefits versus actual benefits; delayed writ petition; notional fixation of pension with notional increments; arrears of revised pension; Ayurved and Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag; Department of Finance, Government of Rajasthan; Dr. Sukh Ram v. State of Rajasthan; Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma v. State of Rajasthan; mutatis mutandis application of earlier Division Bench orders.
What did the court decide?
Civil Writ Petition allowed in the terms of Dr. Sukh Ram (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9910/2025, decided on 13.08.2025) mutatis mutandis: retirement age reckoned as 62 years; only notional benefits for the period 60-62 years on account of delay in approaching the Court; pension notionally fixed as if retired at 62 with notional increments, last pay recalculated and pension revised; arrears of revised pension from 62 years onward to be calculated and released expeditiously, preferably within three months; pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.