Dismissed

Kiran Jef D/O Hanuman Sahai v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Feb 2025CW/14429/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a representation with supporting material to the District Education Officer regarding parity benefits, directing the authority to dispose of it within eight weeks according to law.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to make a detailed representation with material particulars to the jurisdictional District Education Officer; authority directed to decide within eight weeks.

Kiran Jef D/O Hanuman Sahai Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14429/2024

¶3

Kiran Jef D/o Hanuman Sahai, aged about 37 Years, Resident of Village Post Bagawas Aheeran, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶8

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur.

¶9

District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Jaipur (Raj.).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Aswal For Respondent(s) :

¶12

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶13

Order

¶14

03/02/2025

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue agitated in this petition is covered on all fours by the judgment of this Court in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Others Versus State of Rajasthan & Others and connected matters, SBCWP No. 3247/2015 decided on 01.04.2015. Counsel submitted that albeit the case of the petitioner is covered by the principle enunciated in the aforesaid judgment of this Court, the petitioner similarly entitled is not being granted notional benefits on the post of Teacher Gr. III with effect from the date they are due.

¶16

[CW-14429/2024]

¶17

(2 of 3)

¶18

Perusal of the writ petition indicates that requisite documents for this Court to evaluate the case set up by the petitioner is not annexed to the petition. In absence of such documents this Court cannot ascertain whether the petitioner case is at par with that of

¶19

Hemlata Shrimali & Others (supra).

¶20

Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in this state of affairs the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to make a representation with supporting material to the jurisdictional District Education Officer ventilating his grievance and claiming parity with Hemlata Shrimali (Supra).

¶21

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. The petitioner shall be at liberty to make a detailed representation with material particulars to the jurisdictional District Education Officer with reference to the law enunciated by this court in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Others (supra). In the event of a representation being submitted by the petitioner ventilating his grievance, the jurisdictional District Education Officer is directed to dispose it of in accordance with law, in the light of the judgment passed in the case of Hemlata Shrimali & Ors. (supra) to the extent applicable with reference to the facts of the petitioner’s case, by a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks of its receipt.

¶22

The present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶24

Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide

¶25

[CW-14429/2024]

¶26

(3 of 3)

¶27

the representation in a particular way, the respondents would be

¶28

at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.

¶29

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶30

Ashu/10

Kiran Jef D/O Hanuman Sahai v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Jef D/O Hanuman Sahai v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.S.R.T.C. Vs Bhuri Lal and Ors.

Dr. Preeti Bhatt D/O Mahendra Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Smt Sajjana Kumari Vs State Medical and Health Ors.

Smt Kiran Bhatia W/O Shri Tilak Bhatia Vs State of Rajasthan

Kalyan Prasad S/O Bholanath (Deceased) through Legal Representative Vs Thakurji Sitaramji Virajman Mandir Qila Utgir Village Gota

Dwarka Prasad Sharma S/O Shri Mitthan Lal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan