The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13088/2020 by directing the respondent to decide a pending application within eight weeks.
Direction to respondent to decide pending application within eight weeks via reasoned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:1991]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13088/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
Nagar Nigam Greater Jaipur, Through Its Commissioner, Head Quarter, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rudra Kumar Saran
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order
15/01/2025
This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:
“(1) The respondent shall decide the pending application filed by the petitioners pursuant to judgment dated 09.12.1988 passed by the Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur in appeal no.65/1986 within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order vide a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law with its communication to the petitioners.”
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
DIKSHA /108
Satya Narayan Charaniya and others
Nagar Nigam Greater Jaipur
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
