The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the Civil Writ Petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:5655]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1171/2025
Vinod Son Of Gyarsa, Resident Of Village Sikandara, District Dausa (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:5655]
[CW-1171/2025]
Village Sikandara, Tehsil Sikaray, District Dausa. At Present Sadar Motiyakhan, Delhi.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
10/02/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this Civil Writ Petition.
Therefore, the Civil Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /09
Vinod
Lalchand Nawariya
Roopchand (Legal Heirs: Nirmala Devi, Anurag)
Lakhpat
Suresh
Jagdish (Legal Heirs: Hardayal, Mukesh)
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
