Writ petition seeking consideration of a post-cut-off Taekwondo sports certificate for Informatics Assistant appointment under the Outstanding Sports Person category. Court held the error-correction order did not extend the advertisement's cut-off date; no illegality found.
None granted; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:29467]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11502/2025
Bhanu Pratap Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Plot No. 30, Alkapuri Colony Pt Fatehlal Nagar Link Road, Madanganj, Kishangarh District - Ajmer State - Rajasthan 305801
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Anand Sharma for |
|---|---|
| Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma | |
| For Respondent(s) | : |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/08/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:29467]
[CW-11502/2025]
(2 of 3)
"x. mRd’V f[kykfM;ksa ds inksa gsrq l{ke Lrj ls tkjh [ksy izek.k i= tks vkWuykbZu vkosnu dh vfUre fu/kkZfjr fnukad ls iwoZ dk gks dk izek.k i= iLrqr djus ij gh mRd’V f[kykMh dksVs ds inksa dk ykHk ns; gksxkA"
(3 of 3)
[2025:RJ-JP:29467]
[CW-11502/2025]
cut off date which was already determined in the Advertisement in clause (x) reproduced hereinabove.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
RONAK JAIMAN/3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a sports certificate dated after the application cut-off could be considered for appointment under the Outstanding Sports Person category.
Whether an error-correction window amounted to extension of the cut-off date.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhanu Pratap Singh
State of Rajasthan
Joint Director and Head of the Office, Information Technology and Communication Department
Secretary, Staff Selection Board
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
