Dismissed¶35

Antima Meena D/O Shri Ram Niwas Meena W/O Shri Parmanand Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Aug 2025CRLW/815/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Protection of life and liberty writ; Rajasthan HC Jaipur; CRLW 815/2025; petitioner Antima Meena; threats from Respondents 10-13 (husband Parmanand Meena and family); PS Nawalgarh bariki under Sections 126, 135(3) BNSS; SDM Court Nawalgarh action/summons; writ and application dismissed; factual report dated 24-7-2025 to be furnished to counsel; Justice Shubha Mehta.

What did the court decide?

The learned Public Prosecutor was directed to make available to the petitioner's counsel a copy of the factual report dated 24-7-2025 of Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, which records that Respondents 10 to 13 were acted upon (summoned) by the SDM, Nawalgarh. ¶35

Antima Meena D/O Shri Ram Niwas Meena W/O Shri Parmanand Meena Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶35

Issue for consideration

Whether directions should be given to Respondents 1 and 9 to provide security/protection to the petitioner, who alleges receiving threats to her life and liberty from Respondents 10 to 13.

¶28

Court's answer

The complaint lodged by the petitioner (complainant Antima) was entered by Police Station Nawalgarh as 'bariki' under Sections 126, 135(3) BNSS and has already been presented to the SDM Court, Nawalgarh.

¶31

Ratio / Principle

The SDM Court has already acted upon Respondents 10 to 13 (they stand summoned).

¶31

Key takeaways

Given the above position, there remained no further occasion to direct Respondents 1 and 9 to provide protection to the petitioner within this writ petition.ratio¶31
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed, and the accompanying miscellaneous application is likewise dismissed.ratio¶35

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), Justice Shubha Mehta (single judge), order dated 07/08/2025 on S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 815/2025. Petitioner Antima Meena sought directions to Respondents 1 and 9 to afford her protection, alleging threats to her life and liberty from Respondents 10 to 13. Acting on a previous order, the Public Prosecutor reported that the petitioner's complaint had been entered by Police Station Nawalgarh (District Jhunjhunu) as 'bariki' under Sections 126, 135(3) BNSS and presented to the SDM Court, Nawalgarh, which had already acted upon (summoned) Respondents 10 to 13. Finding no further scope for directions in the writ petition, the Court dismissed it together with the accompanying application, and directed the Public Prosecutor to furnish petitioner's counsel a copy of Police Station Nawalgarh's factual report dated 24-7-2025 recording the action taken by the SDM, Nawalgarh, on Respondents 10 to 13.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:30563]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 815/2025

¶4

Antima Meena D/o Shri Ram Niwas Meena W/o Shri Parmanand Meena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Maran, Post Sadera, P.s. Dei, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi, At Present Residing At Village Mishra Ana Wali Dhani, P.s. Nawalgarh, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur.

¶9

The Superintendent Of Police, District Bundi.

¶10

The Superintendent Of Police, District Jhunjhunu.

¶11

The Nodal Officer, Protection Of Life And Liberty, District Bundi.

¶12

The Nodal Officer, Protection Of Life And Liberty, District Jhunjhunu.

¶13

The Sho, Police Station Dei, District Bundi.

¶14

The Sho, Police Station Nainwa, District Bundi.

¶15

The Sho, Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.

¶16

Parmanand Meena S/o Shri Giriraj Meena, R/o Village Maran, Post Sadera, P.s. Dei, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bunid.

¶17

Giriraj Meena S/o Late Shri Kana Meena, R/o Village Maran, Post Sadera, P.s. Dei, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bunid.

¶18

Ram Niwas Meena S/o Shri Bhiva Meena, R/o Village Pai, Post, Fuleta, P.s. Nainwa, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi.

¶19

Bajja Ram Meena S/o Shri Bhiva Meena, R/o Village Pai, Post, Fuleta, P.s. Nainwa, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi.

¶20

----Respondents

¶21

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satyapal Poshwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K.Gupta, PP

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:30563]

[CRLW-815/2025]

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶26

Order

¶27

07/08/2025

¶28

;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kph dh vksj ls v;kph la[;k 10 ls 13 dh vksj ls mls tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk iSnk djus dh /kefd;ka feyus ds dkj.k v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 9 dks mls lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA

¶29

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk rdZ gS fd ;kph vafrek dk fookg pkj o"kZ iwoZ ijekuUn v;kph la[;k&10 ls gqvk Fkk ysfdu mldk o mlds llqjky okyksa dj O;ogkj ;kph ds izfr vPNk ugha FkkA ckn esa ;kph v/;kfidk xzsM&3 ds :i esa fu;qDr gks xbZ] blds ckn Hkh mlds ifr o llqjky okyksa ds O;ogkj esa dksbZ ifjorZu ugha vk;kA ,d fnu ;kph ds ifr us mlds lkFk ekjihV dh vkSj vius xkao pyk x;kA vc og vdsyh jg jgh gS ijUrq v;kphx.k la[;k 10 ls 13] mls tku ls ekjus dh /kedh ns jgs gS o xq.Ms Hkstdj mlds dk;ZLFky fuokl ij mls tku ls ekjus dh /kedh ns jgs gS o mlds ifjokj okys mldk fookg iSls ysdj vU;= djuk pkgrs gSA vr% v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 9 dks mls lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tk;sA

¶30

iwoZ vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vkt fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk izdj.k dh rF;kRed fjiksVZ izLrqr dh xbZ] ftlds vuqlkj ifjokfn;k vfUrek }kjk izsf"kr ifjokn ij iqfyl Fkkuk&uoyx< }kjk bLrxklk vUrxZr /kkjk 126] 135¼3½ ch,u,l,l esa ,l-Mh-,e- U;k;ky;] uoyx< esa is'k fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk ,l-Mh-,eU;k;ky; }kjk v;kph la[;k 10 ls 13 dks ikcUn fd;k tk pqdk gSA

¶31

,slh fLFfr esa] tcfd ifjokfn;k vfUrek }kjk izsf"kr ifjokn ij iqfyl Fkkuk&uoyx< }kjk bLrxklk vUrxZr /kkjk 126] 135¼3½ ch,u,l,l esa ,l-Mh-,eU;k;ky;] uoyx< esa is'k fd;k tk pqdk gS rFkk ,l-Mh-,e- U;k;ky; }kjk v;kph la[;k 10 ls 13 dks ikcUn fd;k tk pqdk gS] bl fjV ;kfpdk esa v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 9 dks mls lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:30563]

[CRLW-815/2025]

(3 of 3)

ifj.kkeLo:i ;g fjV ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA lkFk gh layXu LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶36

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd iqfyl Fkkuk&uoyx<] ftyk&>qU>quq dh rF;kRed fjiksVZ fnukafdr 24-7-2025] ftlesa v;kph la[;k 10 ls 13 dks ,l-Mh-,e- uoyx< }kjk ikcUn fd;s tkus dk mYys[k fd;k x;k gS] dh ,d izfr ;kfpdkdkj ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks miyC/k djkosA

¶37

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶38

JITENDRA SINGH PANWAR /4

Antima Meena D/O Shri Ram Niwas Meena W/O Shri Parmanand Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Antima Meena D/O Shri Ram Niwas Meena W/O Shri Parmanand Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devendra Singh Rajawat S/O Tejsingh Rajawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Paras Bai Jat W/O Devi Lal Jat, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kavita Devi W/O Late Dinesh Meena, D/O Shahir Meena, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Bhuriya @ Bhuralal S/O Uda Vs State of Rajasthan

Kajal Ansari Daughter of Wahid Ali, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kiran Bundela Wife of Vishnu Datt Sharma Daughter of Shri Hajari Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan