Allowed

Mohammad Aarif S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Aug 2025CRLW/746/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of all pending criminal proceedings on FIR No. 507/2016, Police Station Ramganj. After trial, accused were acquitted under Sections 323 and 341 IPC following compromise; only Section 324 IPC remained. The Court held the offence non-grave and parties inter-related, quashed remaining Section 324 IPC proceedings and disposed of pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of all pending criminal proceedings under Section 324 IPC against respondents 3 and 4 in FIR No. 507/2016, PS Ramganj; pending applications disposed.

Mohammad Aarif S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Vs State of… — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:31986]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 746/2025

¶4

Mohammad Aarif S/o Shri Mohammad Hanif, R/o Village Niwai Thana Niwai District Tonk. Presently Panchayati Masjid Mohalla Mahawatan Thana Ramganj, Jaipur.

¶5

Mohammad Abid S/o Mohammad Hanif, R/o Village Niwai Thana Niwai District Tonk, Presently House No. 3242, Panchayati Masjid Dhanko Ka Tabela, Mohalla Mahawtan Chowkdi Topkhana Hajuri Ramganj, Jaipur.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

Court Upper Civil Judge And Judicial Magistrate No. 12, Jaipur Mahanagar Second.

¶10

Abid S/o Mohammad Yusuf, Aged About 22 Years, R/o House No. 1663, Mohalla Imam Chowk, Geejgarh Ka Rasta, Ramganj, Jaipur.

¶11

Mohammad Yunus S/o Shri Mohammad Yusuf, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 1663, Mohalla Imam Chowk, Geejgarh Ka Rasta, Ramganj, Jaipur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashrut Sethi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶14

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶15

Order

¶16

14/08/2025

¶17

;kphx.k ¼[email protected]½ dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 507@2016] iqfyl Fkkuk jkexat ds laca/k esa yfEcr leLr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks lekIr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk djrs gq, izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶18

;kphx.k ¼[email protected]½ us ;kfpdk esa ;g vfHkdFku fd;k gS fd muds }kjk fnukad 12-10-2016 dks iqfyl Fkkuk jkexat esa ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 507@2016 ekS0 vkfcn o ekS0 ;quql ds fo:) ntZ djokbZ xbZ Fkh] ftlesa

[2025:RJ-JP:31986]

[CRLW-746/2025]

(2 of 3)

vUos"k.k ds ckn v;kph la[;k 3 o 4 ekS0 vkfcn o ekS0 ;quql ds fo:) vkjksii= izLrqr fd;k x;k vkSj fopkj.k vkjEHk gqvk A fopkj.k ds nkSjku ;kph@ifjoknh i{k o v;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k ds e/; le>kSrk gks x;k] ftlds vk/kkj ij v;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 323 341 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vkjksiksa ls nks"keqDr dj fn;k x;k gS] ijUrq /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k 'keuh; ugha gksus ds dkj.k mlds laca/k esa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) fopkj.k 'ks"k jgk gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) tks /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k dk vkjksi gS] og t?kU; vijk/k dh Js.kh esa ugha dgk tk ldrk gSA izdj.k ds i{kdkj vkil esa laca/kh gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa muesa lkSgknZiw.kZ laca/k cus jgs] blfy, ;g vko';d gS fd /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds laca/k esa izdj.k dh 'ks"k jgh dk;Zokgh dks le>kSrs ds vk/kkj ij lekIr dj fn;k tkosA vr% izdj.k esa laca/k esa fopkj.k dh yfEcr dk;Zokgh dks lekIr djus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA vius mDr rdZ ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p; izLrqr fd;s x;s&

¶23

Narinder Singh and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Anr. (2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases 466

¶24

Mohd. Azam vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. S.B. Criminal Misc. (Petition) No. 1240/2021 Dated 25.02.2021

¶25

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶26

geus izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh o izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa ;kphx.k }kjk vius lkFk gqbZ ekjihV ds laca/k esa ntZ djokbZ xbZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij v;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k vkfcn o ekS0 ;quql ds fo:) /kkjk 323] 341] 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa vkjksii= izLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA fopkj.k ds nkSjku i{kdkjksa ds e/; le>kSrk gksus ls vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 323] 341 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k ds vkjksi esa nks"keqDr dj fn;k x;k rFkk /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k 'keuh; ugha gksus ls blds laca/k esa izdj.k dk fopkj.k vHkh tkjh gSA /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k t?kU; izdfr dk ugha gS vkSj u gh ,slh izdfr dk gS] ftlls lekt ij foijhr izHkko iM+rk gksA i{kdkjksa ds e/; le>kSrk gks pqdk gS rFkk i{kdkj vkil esa

[2025:RJ-JP:31986]

[CRLW-746/2025]

(3 of 3)

laca/kh gSA vr% muds e/; 'kkafr o lkSgknZiw.kZ okrkoj.k cuk jgs] blds fy, izdj.k esa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds laca/k esa 'ks"k jgh dk;Zokgh dks lekIr fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA ;gh fl)kUr ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; o bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk mi;qZDr U;kf;d fu.kZ;ksa esa Hkh izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gSA

¶31

ifj.kker% ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 507@2016 iqfyl Fkkuk jkexat] t;iqj ds laca/k esa v;kph@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 324 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k esa yfEcr leLr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh lekIr ¼quash½ dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶32

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶33

VISHAL SHARMA /56

Mohammad Aarif S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Aarif S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms. Aachu Sharma D/O Santosh Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Aadil Khan S/O Innas Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Kamlesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappulal S/O Motilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Godawari W/O Sonu Harijan Vs State of Rajasthan

Pukhraj @ Pukharam Mehghwal S/O Shri Momtaram Meghwal Vs State of Rajasthan