Allowed

Shri Mohammad Rafiq S/O Sh. Jumma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Jul 2025CRLW/743/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a Magistrate's conditional release order requiring deposit of Rs. 3,00,000/- for return of a vehicle seized under the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act. The High Court modified the impugned order, exempting the petitioner from the deposit condition and disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Exemption from the condition of depositing Rs. 3,00,000/- for release of the seized vehicle; remainder of order dated 27-02-2025 left intact.

Shri Mohammad Rafiq S/O Sh. Jumma Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:24102]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 743/2025

¶4

Shri Mohammad Rafiq S/o Sh. Jumma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Near Mata Temple, Mev Mohalla Kutakpur Patti Sikri, Police Station Sikri District Bharatpur (At Present District Deeg) Raj.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The District Collector, District Deeg.

¶9

The Superintendent Of Police, Deeg.

¶10

Sho, Police Station Sadar, Deeg, District Bharatpur.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Surendra Singh with
	Mr. AnoopKumar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. J.S.Rathore,PP

¶13

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶14

Order

¶15

01/07/2025

¶16

;kph@okgu Lokeh dh vksj ls ;g vkijkf/kd fjV ;kfpdk fo}ku U;k;ky; ftyk dyDVj Mhx }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk lnj ftyk Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 389@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 5@8 jktLFkku xkSoa'kh; i'kq ¼o/k izfr"ks/k vkSj vLFkkbZ izoztu ;k fu;kZr dk fofu;eu½ vf/kfu;e esa tCr'kqnk okgu dS.Vªk iath;u la[;k ,pvkj&74 ,&7473 dks lqiqnZxh ij izkIr djus ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr izkFkZuk&i= la[;k&22@2023 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 27-02-+2025 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk ;kph@okgu Lokeh dks 300000@&:i;s v{kjs rhu yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k 30 fnu ds Hkhrj jktdks"k esa tek djkus dh 'krZ ij tCr'kqnk okgu lqiqnZxh ij fn, tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:24102]

[CRLW-743/2025]

(2 of 2)

cgl lquh xbZA ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ jgk gS fd izdj.k esa tCr'kqnk okgu dk ;kph iathd`r Lokeh gSA ;kph ,oa mlds okgu dks xyr :i ls izdj.k esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA ;kph vkfFkZd :i ls detksj gS rFkk fo}ku U;k;ky; ftyk dyDVj Mhx }kjk vf/kjksfir jkf'k tek djkus esa vleFkZ gSA tCr'kqnk okgu dh ;kph dks Lo;a ds mi;ksx gsrq vko';drk gSA vr% fo}ku dyDVj Mhx }kjk ikfjr vkykSP; vkns'k esa la'kks/ku djrs gq, vf/kjksfir jkf'k tek djkus ls ;kph dks NwV@eqfDr iznku dh tkosA

¶21

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fojks/k djrs gq, ;kfpdk fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶22

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA bl ekeys esa iqfyl }kjk fnukad 21-12-2022 dks iz'uxr okgu tCr fd;k x;k gS rFkk rc ls vFkkZr fiNys yxHkx <kbZ o"kZ ls okgu iqfyl ds vkf/kiR; esa csdkj [kM+k gSA okgu ds vfuf'pr le; rd [kM+k jgus ls mlds {kfrxzLr gksus ,oa jk"Vªh; lEink dks uqdlku igqapus dh laHkkouk gSA ;kph iz'uxr okgu dk iathd`r Lokeh crk;k x;k gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, okgu lqiqnZxh ds lEcU/k esa vf/kjksfir jkf'k tek djkus dh 'krZ ls ;kph dks NwV@eqfDr iznku fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶23

ifj.kker% fo}ku U;k;ky; ftyk dyDVj Mhx }kjk ikfjr vkykSP; vkns'k fnukad 27-02-2025 esa vkaf'kd la'kks/ku djrs gq, okgu lqiqnZxh ds lEcU/k esa vf/kjksfir 300000@&:i;s v{kjs rhu yk[k :i;s dh jkf'k jktdks"k esa tek djkus dh 'krZ ls ;kph dks NwV@eqfDr iznku dh tkrh gSA vkns'k fnukafdr 27-02-2025 dk 'ks"k Hkkx ;Fkkor jgsxkA

¶24

rnuqlkj fjV ;kfpdk ,oa layXu izkFkZuk&i= ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶25

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶26

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /160

Shri Mohammad Rafiq S/O Sh. Jumma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Mohammad Rafiq S/O Sh. Jumma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Apsana D/O Umardeen, Vs State of Rajasthan

Harmeet Singh S/O Manmohan Singh Vs Gaurav Mehandiratta S/O Shri Narayandas

Aaseeya W/O Isarail Vs State of Rajasthan

Naveen Sharma S/O Late Shri Harihar Swaroop Sharma Vs the State of Rajasthan

Hament Mehta S/O Sushil Mehta Vs State of Rajasthan

Roshan Sharma S/O Shri Shyamlal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan