Petitioners sought quashing of an ACB FIR for offences under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) PC Act and Section 120-B IPC. After the investigating agency submitted a closure report dated 25.09.2025, counsel declined to press the petitions and the court dismissed them as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 495/2022
Shyamlal Meena S/o Ramphool Meena, R/o House No. 37, Gopal Vihar -1St, Police Line, Kota, At That Time Administrator, Kota Kriya-Vikrya Sahakari Samiti Limited, Kota, At Present Additional Registrar, Cooperative Society, Jaipur Zone, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 496/2022
Shobhagmal Meena S/o Surajmal Meena, R/o Dandotiya Ki Badi, Tel Factory, Baran. At That Time General Manager, Kota KriyaVikrya Sahakari Samiti Limited, Kota (Now Retired).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Kumar Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Addl.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
15/10/2025
These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners for quashing FIR No. 286/2022 registered at Police Station Pradhan
[CRLW-495/2022]
(2 of 2)
Arakshi, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur District ACB, Kota, for the offence under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 120-B IPC.
Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted the closure report dated 25.09.2025.
In view of the fact that closure report dated 25.09.2025 has been submitted, learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the above writ petitions.
The Criminal Writ Petitions are dismissed, as not pressed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Gourav/38-39
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act should be quashed; petitioners did not press after a closure report was submitted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shyamlal Meena
Shobhagmal Meena
The State Of Rajasthan
Dinesh Kumar Vijay
Bhuwan Goyal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
