A married couple alleged threats from the wife's family after their inter-community marriage and sought police protection, having earlier submitted an unactioned representation. The court directed respondents 1-4 to consider the representation and act per law to protect their life and liberty, and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:26884]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 336/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
Mr. Suresh Gurjar
For Petitioner(s)
:
(2 of 4)
[2025:RJ-JP:26884]
[CRLW-336/2025]
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K.Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
18/07/2025
dk;kZy; vkifRr la[;k&1 o 2 nwj djus ds lEcU/k esa ;kph ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dks lquk x;kA
fjV ;kfpdk ds vk/kkjksa esa vk{ksi la[;k&2 ds lEcU/k esa vfHkdFku gksus rFkk uksMy vf/kdkjh@iqfyl v/kh{kd dks Hksts x, izfrosnu dh izfr rFkk Mkd jlhn@izfr layXu gksus ds dkj.k dk;kZy; }kjk bafxr nksuksa vk{ksi nwj fd, tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA
;g fjV ;kfpdk ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izR;FkhZ la[;k 6 yxk;r 13 dh vksj ls mUgsa tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk iSnk djus dh /kefd;ka feyus ds dkj.k izR;FkhZ la[;k&1 yxk;r 5 dks mUgsa lqj{kk iznku djus ds funsZ'k fn, tkus gsrq izLrqr dh gSA
nksuksa i{kksa dks ;kfpdk ij lquk x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk rdZ gS fd ;kfpdkdkj o;Ld gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 lqeu ;kno dh tUe frfFk mlds iSu dkMZ dh izfr ds vuqlkj 28-01-1999 ,oa ;kph la[;k&2 f'kojkt ;kno dh tUe frfFk mlds iSu dkMZ dh izfr ds vuqlkj 02-10-+2002 gS tks izLrqr nLrkostkr dh izfr;ksa ls Li"Vr% izdV gks jgh gSA bl izdkj ls os nksuksa o;Ld gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k us vk;Z lekt oSfnd fookg laLdkj VªLV xkft;kckn mRrj izns'k esa fookg dj fy;k gS rFkk mldk iath;u Hkh djok fy;k gSA ftuds izek.k&i= dh izfr ifjf'k"V&3 o 4 ds :i esa layXu izek.k&i=ksa ls izekf.kr gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k fookg ds ckn 'kkafriwoZd fuokl dj jgs gSa rFkk v;kph la[;k&6 yxk;r 13 muds bl fookg ls [kq'k ugha gSa vkSj muls ;kphx.k dks tku ,oa Lora=rk dk [krjk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mUgksaus U;k;ky; esa ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus ls iwoZ Fkkukf/kdkjh@uksMy vf/kdkjh ,oa iqfyl v/kh{kd dks ,d izfrosnu ifjf'k"V&5 iathd`r Mkd ls fHktok
[2025:RJ-JP:26884]
[CRLW-336/2025]
(3 of 4)
fn;k gSA ijarq muds }kjk dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha dh xbZ gS] vr% ;kphx.k dks iqfyl lqj{kk iznku dh tkosA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us fookfgr tksM+ksa dh lqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa U;kf;d fofu'p; izdk'k flag ,oa vU;&cuke&;wfu;u vkWQ bf.M;k esa funZs'k fn, gSa rFkk vuqPNsn 21 Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ,oa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofu'p; yrk flag&cuke&mRrj izns'k jkT; ,vkbZvkj 2006 ,llh 2522] ,l[kq'kcw&cuke&dUukbZEey 2010 ¼5½ ,llhlh 600] bUnzk ljek& cuke&ohdsoh ljek ¼2013½ 15 ,llhlh 755 rFkk 'kQhu tgku&cuke&vlksdu ds,e ,oa vU; ¼2018½ 16 ,llhlh 368 esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd, x, gSa fd izR;sd o;Ld O;fDr viuh bPNkuq:i jgus dks Lora= gSA fof/k }kjk LFkkfir izfØ;k ds vfrfjDr muds thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk dk guu djus dk fdlh dks vf/kdkj ugha gSA os dkuwu ds varxZr vius thou vkSj O;fDrxr Lora=rk ds izfr laj{k.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA blds vfrfjDr jktLFkku iqfyl vf/kfu;e 2007 dh /kkjk 29 ds vuqlkj izR;sd iqfyl vf/kdkjh dk ;g drZO; gS fd og ukxfjdksa ds thou o O;fDrxr Lora=rk dh j{kk djsA
gLrxr izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ;kphx.k ds dFkuksa dh lnHkkfodrk o lR;rk ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ Hkh fVIi.kh o fu"d"kZ fn, fcuk rFkk mDr fof/kd fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, v;kph la[;k&1 yxk;r 4 dks ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gS a fd os ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izsf"kr i= ifjf'k"V&5 dks fopkj (consider) esa yk,a o ;kphx.k dh dfFkr vlqj{kk ds lEcU/k esa vkdyu ds i'pkr vlqj{kk dk rRo ik, tkus ij fu;ekuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks fdlh izdkj dh {kfr@gkfu dkfjr ugha gksuk lqfuf'pr djsaA
blh vuqlkj ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA LFkxu ,oa vU; dksbZ izkFkZuk&i= ;fn dksbZ gks] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA
[2025:RJ-JP:26884]
[CRLW-336/2025]
(4 of 4)
;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;g vkns'k ;kphx.k ds fo:) yfEcr ;k izLrqr gksus okyh fdlh nhokuh@vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugha djsxk ,oa ,slh dk;Zokgh fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr dh tk,xhA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /147
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police are bound to consider the petitioners' representation and provide protection to a married couple facing threats to life and liberty from relatives.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Shakti Vahini v. Union of IndiaRelied on¶6
Laxmi Kant Pandey v. State (NCT of Delhi)Relied on¶6
AIR 2006 SC 2522 · Who else cites this
Arumugam Servai v. State of Tamil NaduRelied on¶6
2010 (5) SCC 600 · Who else cites this
Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. SarmaRelied on¶6
(2013) 15 SCC 755 · Who else cites this
Shafin Jahan v. Asokan K.M.Relied on¶6
(2018) 16 SCC 368 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Suman Yadav
Shivraj Yadav
State Of Rajasthan
The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan
The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural
The SHO, Police Station Kotkhavda
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
