Disposed

Shivani Kumari Kushwah W/O Santosh Kumar, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Nov 2025CRLW/1469/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A married couple sought police protection against family members opposing their marriage. The court invoked Article 21 and Section 29 of the Rajasthan Police Act, directing officers to assess threat perceptions per earlier Suman Meena directions and provide protection if needed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Shivani Kumari Kushwah W/O Santosh Kumar, Vs State… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:45729]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.1469/2025

¶4

Shivani Kumari Kushwah W/o Santosh Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dimna Lek Mirjadih Ajapa Gayatrib Ashram Patamda, Pagda, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand And At Present Sinsini Bharatpur Rajasthan, Rajasthan (Aadhar Card Number 430623003441)

¶5

Santosh Kumar S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sinsini Bharatpur Rajasthan, Rajasthan (Aadhar Card Number 290807683631)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

The Director General Of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶10

Superintendent Of Police, Deeg, Raj.

¶11

Station House Officer, Police Station Kotwali, Deeg.

¶12

Giraj Prasad Kushwah, S/o Dhanudhari Kushwah, R/o Dimna Lek Mirjadih Ajapa Gayatrib Ashram Patamda, Pagda, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.

¶13

Motilal Kushwah, S/o Dhanudhari Kushwah, R/o Dimna Lek Mirjadih Ajapa Gayatrib Ashram Patamda, Pagda, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.

¶14

Babu Lal Kushwah S/o Namalum, R/o Dimna Lek Mirjadih Ajapa Gayatrib Ashram Patamda, Pagda, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.singod Kalan Jaipur.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mritunjya Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP

¶17

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶18

Order

¶19

13/11/2025

¶20

Defect(s) pointed out by the Office stands waived.

[2025:RJ-JP:45729]

[CRLW-1469/2025]

(2 of 3)

The petitoners have preferred this petition for issuance of necessary directions to the official-respondents to provide adequate security and protection to them on the ground that they are facing grave threat to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s).

¶25

Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same. 4. The contents of the petition indicate that both the petitioners are of major age and they have solemnized marriage with each other on 08.10.2025, and their marriage has been registered by the competent authority as well. A certificate in this regard has also been issued and life and liberty of the petitioners are stated to be at stake at the hands of the private respondents and prior to approaching this Court, the petitioners had already submitted representations before the Nodal Officer/Superintendent of Police, Jaipur and the concerned Station House Officer, pursuant to the orders passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Suman Meena vs. State of Rajasthan while deciding S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.792/2024 , but no heed has been paid, hence, under the compelling circumstances, the petitioners have approached this Court.

¶26

It is well settled legal position as expounded by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Lata Singh Vs. State of UP, reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal, reported in (2010) 5 SCC 600, Indra Sarma Vs. VKV Sarma reported in (2013) 15 SCC 755 and Shafin Jahan Vs. Asokan KM

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:45729]

[CRLW-1469/2025]

reported in (2018) 16 SCC 368 that the life and personal liberty of the individuals has to be protected except according to procedure established by law, as mandated by Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, as per Section 29 of the Rajasthan Police Act, 2007 every police officer is duty bound to protect the life and liberty of the citizens.

¶31

Looking to the fact that the petitioners have already submitted appropriate representation/application seeking protection before the Nodal Officer as well as concerned Station House Officer, it is expected from the officers concerned to look into the matter in terms of the directions issued by this Court in the case of Suman Meena (supra) and ensure that after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶32

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceeding initiated against the petitioners.

¶33

With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal writ petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶34

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶35

Karan/205

Shivani Kumari Kushwah W/O Santosh Kumar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Shivani Kumari Kushwah W/O Santosh Kumar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhinav Choudhari S/O Shripal Choudhari Vs State of Rajasthan

Deendayal Son of Kehari, Vs Smt. Rekha Wife of Deendayal D/O Jasram

Vinod S/O Shri Murlidhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Official Liquidator Vs Union of India

Omprakash Gangbal Son of Shri Chiranjilal, Vs Ramesh Khinchi Son of Shri Kishanlal

Kishanlal Sonawa S/O Shri Ramlal Sonawa, Vs State of Rajasthan