Disposed

Meera @ Mintu W/O Shri Hawasingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2025CRLW/1115/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No.1115/2025 disposed of a petition challenging the rejection of a parole application. The court directed the District Parole Advisory Committee to reconsider the application afresh expeditiously within two months.

What did the court decide?

The District Parole Advisory Committee is directed to consider the application afresh expeditiously within two months.

Meera @ Mintu W/O Shri Hawasingh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:38257-DB]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No.1115/2025

¶4

Meera @ Mintu W/o Shri Hawasingh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Majra Kanhawas, Police Station Mandhan, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present In Open Air Camp, Alwar, Raj.) Through Her Husband Shri Hawasingh S/o Shri Jairam, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Majra Kanhawas, Police Station Mandhan, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Prisons, Directorate Prisons, Ghatgate, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶8

District Magistrate, Kotputli-Behror, Office At Collectorate, Kotputli-Behror (Raj.)

¶9

Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar (Raj.)

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Tekchand Swami
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Rajesh Chaudhary, GA cum AAG
	with Mr. Aman Kumar

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order

¶13

18/09/2025

¶14

This petition is filed challenging the order dated 17.06.2025 passed by District Parole Advisory Committee Kotputli, Behror (Rajasthan), rejecting the prayer for fourth regular parole.

¶15

Learned counsel for the respondent on instructions submits that if there is any change in circumstances, the application shall be considered afresh without being influenced by the impugned order passed.

¶16

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, the petition is disposed of. Let the committee consider

¶17

[2025:RJ-JP:38257-DB]

¶18

[CRLW-1115/2025]

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

the application afresh expeditiously within two months from the receipt of the certified copy of this order.

¶21

(BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J

¶22

(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J

¶23

DIKSHA MISHRA /18

Meera @ Mintu W/O Shri Hawasingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Meera @ Mintu W/O Shri Hawasingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Mehta S/O Shri Leela Ram Yadav Vs Rajasthan Para Medical Council

Ramswaroop Meena Son of Shri Shivram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhairu Prakash Verma S/O Shri Kanhaiya Lal Verma Vs Rajasthan Para Medical Council

Ankit Gupta S/O Sh. Rambabu Gupta Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre

Morpal Gurjar Son of Shri Ramkaran Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mrs. Manjula Rani Gupta Wife of Late Shri I.R. Gupta Vs Punjab National Bank