Vishal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Rajasthan High Court held that while maintaining conviction under Section 325 IPC, the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone by the accused-petitioner who faced protracted trial for 27 years and had served time in custody, citing principles of ends of justice.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; bail bonds cancelled; accused on bail; no surrender required.
What the court decided
[2025:RJ-JP:44789]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 909/2007
Vishal S/o Shri Mangal Ram, R/o Teej Ki Swarn Road, Behind Balmiki Temple, Alwar (Raj)
----Accused/Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Gurvinder Singh |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Jitendra Singh Rathore,AGA |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Judgment
07/11/2025
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the quantum of sentence awarded to the accused-petitioner under Section 325 IPC, who had already undergone detention, requires reduction in interest of justice.
Whether the conviction maintained by lower courts requires interference in the revision petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vishal S/o Shri Mangal Ram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan through PP
Coram
BHUWAN GOYAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/909/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court