The High Court allowed the criminal revision petition and quashed the conviction under Section 138 of the NI Act based on a settlement deed between the parties.
Quashing of conviction and set aside of orders dated 18-03-2017 and 30-03-2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:32034]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 770/2025
Rajnigandha Wife Of Shri Dayaram Sharma, Resident Of Plot No 171 Scheme No 4 Dayanand Bal Vidhya Mandir Secondary School Alwar At Present Resident Of Hindupada Near Santan Mandir, Alwar (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
Mukesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Raghuveer Prasad Sharma, Resident Of Rajaji Ka Bas, Police Line Alwar (Rajasthan)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Babu Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
18/08/2025
/kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e ds vkosnu ij lquk x;kA
vkosnu esa of.kZr dkj.kksa dks ns[krs gq,] tks 1390 fnu dk foyEc gqvk gS] mls ekQ fd;k tkrk gSA blh vuqlkj ;g vkosnu Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"B U;kf;d eftLVªsV ¼,u-vkbZ-,DV½] la[;k&01] vyoj }kjk izdj.k la[;k &84@2015 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 18-03-2017] ftlds rgr v;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph@vfHk;qDrk dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ,oa 6]00]000@&:i;s dk vFkZn.M@izfrdj vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k] vne vnk;xh@izfrdj vFkZn.M nks ekg ds vfrfjDr lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &17@2017 v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] vyoj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 30-03-2021 ls
[CRLR-770/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:32034]
(2 of 2)
[kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph@vfHk;qDrk dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph dk dFku jgk fd i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk ifjoknh dks ;kph }kjk jkthukek vuqlkj jkf'k vnk dj nh xbZ gS ,oa bl dze esa fyf[kr esa le>kSrk i=@jkthukek i=koyh ij izLrqr gSA mDr le>kSrk i=@jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek LosPN;k ls gksuk crk;k gS] le>kSrk i=@jkthukek i=koyh ij miyC/k gS rFkk jftLVªkj U;kf;d }kjk mls rLnhd fd;k x;k gS] vijk/k 'keuh; gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa mijksDr jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij ;kph@vfHk;qDRkk dks /kkjk 138 ,u-vkbZ-,DV ds vijk/k ls nks"keqDr fd;k tkuk lehphu gSA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ,oa fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dze'k% fnukafdr 18-03-2017 ,oa 30-03-2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDrk dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls tfj, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA
ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= o vU; yafcr vkosnu ;fn dksbZ gks] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /105 (S)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision petition against the conviction under Section 138 NI Act is maintainable on the ground of settlement?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajnigandha Wife Of Shri Dayaram Sharma
Mukesh Kumar Sharma
Uma Shanker Vyas
Dinesh Kumawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
