Allowed

Bheemsingh Son of Jasvant v. Sanjay Kumar Son of Ramavtar

Rajasthan HC3 Mar 2025CRLR/56/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed thecriminalrevision petition which was barred under Sec 13(2) of Scholared Liberation Act 2023. Court considered sufficient guarantee and remanded matter to court of resort for second dashtari.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner acquitted under Sec 376 IPC. Order under Sec 13(2) Narcomedra Vyavasthapan Act 2023 quashed. Sufficient guarantee required by court of resort.

Bheemsingh Son of Jasvant Vs Sanjay Kumar Son of Ramavtar — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 56/2025

¶3

Bheemsingh Son Of Jasvant, Resident Of Plot No. 171, Near Heerapura Power House, Shakti Nagar, Ajmer Road Jaipur

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

Sanjay Kumar Son Of Ramavtar, Resident Of Niwai District Tonk

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Arvind Sharma, Adv. Mr. Bheemsingh(petitioner inperson)
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar (respondent in person)

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶10

Order

¶11

03/03/2025

¶12

1- mDr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk 690 fnu ds foyEc ls izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftls {kek djus gsrq bl ;kfpdk ds lkFk ,d izkFkZuk i= la[;k&13@2025 varxZr /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

2- izkFkZuk i= esa vafdr rF;ksa ,oa dkj.kksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj ;g ;kfpdk izLrqr djus esa gq, 690 fnu ds foyEc dks {kek fd;k tkrk gSA

¶14

3- ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk&438 lifBr /kkjk&442 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] 2023 ds rgr fopkj.k U;k;ky; vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVsªV] fuokbZ] ftyk&Vksad ¼ftls vkxs ^fopkj.k U;k;ky;* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k& 86@2006] cmuoku lat; dqekj cuke Hkheflag esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 05-09-2017 o vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ftyk ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] fuokbZ] ftyk&Vksad ¼ftls vkxs ^vihyh; U;k;ky;* ds uke ls

¶15

[CRLR-56/2025]

¶16

(2 of 3)

¶17

lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk nkf.Md fu;fer vihy la[;k&72@2021] cmuoku Hkheflag cuke lat; dqekj esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o n.Mkns'k fnukad 14-11-2022 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk&138 ijØkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj ,d o"kZ dk lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 2]50]000@& #i;s ¼v{kjs nks yk[k ipkl gtkj :i;s½ ds vFkZn.M] vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M N% ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl dh ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS rFkk fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk mDr n.Mkns'k dh iqf"V dh xbZ gSA

¶18

4- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph us fuosnu fd;k fd i{kdkjku ds e/; jkthukek gks pqdk gS] mldh foijhr vkfFkZd ifjfLFkfr jgh gS] vr% jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

5- mHk; i{kdkjku e; vf/koDrkx.k mifLFkrA ftUgsa muds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk f'kuk[r fd;k x;kA

¶20

6- lquk x;k] izLrqr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA 7- ;|fi izdj.k esa ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; fu;e] 1952 ds fu;e 311¼3½ dh ikyuk ugha dh gS rFkk izdj.k esa Qjkj py jgk gS] ysfdu vfHk;qDr dk vLoLFk gksus rFkk vkfFkZd :i ls detksj gksuk crk;k x;k gS] vr% lHkh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2010¼5½ ,l-lh-lh- 663 Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr dks ns[krs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn ;kph&vfHk;qDr 25]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k jktLFkku jkT; fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k] t;iqj ds le{k tek djokdj mldh jlhn jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½ ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj izLrqr dj nsrk gS rks i{kdkjku dh vksj ls izLrqr jkthukek dks rLnhd fd;s tkus dh dk;Zokgh dh tkosA

¶21

[CRLR-56/2025]

¶22

(3 of 3)

¶23

8- jftLVªkj ¼U;kf;d½ ds dk;kZy; ls bl ekeys esa Hkstk x;k jkthukek rLnhd gksdj izkIr gqvkA i{kdkjku ds e/; jkthukek gks x;k gSA vr% ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶24

9- vr% mijksDr foospukuqlkj jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds fo#) fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k& 86@2006] cmuoku lat; dqekj cuke Hkheflag esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 05-09-2017 o fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk nkf.Md fu;fer vihy la[;k& 72@2021] cmuoku Hkheflag cuke lat; dqekj esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o n.Mkns'k fnukad 14-11-2022] ftlds }kjk fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk dh xbZ nks"kflf) dks iq"V fd;k x;k gS] dks vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ekeys dk fuLrkj.k jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij djrs gq, ;kfpdk Lohdkj dh tkrh gS o ;kph dks jkthukes ds vk/kkj ij nks"keqDr ?kksf"kr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶25

10lHkh yafcr izkFkZuk&i=ksa dks Hkh mijksDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶26

(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J

¶27

LOKESH RAJ/86

Bheemsingh Son of Jasvant v. Sanjay Kumar Son of Ramavtar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bheemsingh Son of Jasvant v. Sanjay Kumar Son of Ramavtar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Devi D/O Late Kabulchand Saini S/O Late Shri Bhudhar W/O Shri Shisram Vs Bansilal S/O Moolchand

N I C Vs Burma Devi

Iffco-Tokio Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Samod Devi and Ors.

Shri Devraj Bhati Son of Late Shri Champalal Bhati Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Pandey Son of Rajendra Pandey Vs Raksha Pandey Wife of Mukesh Kumar Pandey

Yashoda W/O Santosh D/O Radhey Shyam B/C Koli Vs Santosh S/O Vishanlal B/C Koli