Criminal revision petition was not pressed by counsel for the petitioner, who sought its withdrawal. The High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition, directing that the trial court record be returned if received.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:26782]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 512/2025
Kanaram Gurjar Son Of Shri Chhoturam Gurjar, Resident Of Village Badharna Jodla Power House Harmada Dist Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
17/07/2025
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd os bl ;kfpdk dks okfil ysuk pkgrs gSaA
rnuqlkj ;g ;kfpdk okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks mls iqu% okfil izsf"kr fd;k tkosA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Mittal /78
Kanaram Gurjar Son Of Shri Chhoturam Gurjar
Chauthmal Son Of Rampal
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
