Ladu Ram Bairwa v. State of Rajasthan and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:6442]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1357/2015
Ladu Ram Bairwa S/o Shri Rampal, aged 60 years, R/o Mohalla Moti Bagh Choraha, Jaipur Road, Tonk, at present village Sandila, PS Mehandwas, District Tonk
----Petitioner
Versus
----Non-Petitioner
----Complainant/Non-Petitioner
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Happy Sharma with Mr. Sahil Khan for Mr. Nawab Ali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order
13/02/2025
fuxjkdkj@vfHk;qDr ykMw jke cSjok dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk U;k;ky; U;kf;d eftLVsªV] izFke oxZ] Vksad ds QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k 67@2008 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 17-07-2012] ftlds }kjk mls vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 138 ,u vkbZ ,DV ds vkjksi esa nks"kfl) ,oa n.Mkfn"V djrs gq, ,d o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl rFkk ,d yk[k #i;s crkSj izfrdj vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k Fkk] ,oa mlds fo:) izLrqr vihy U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] v-tk-@t-tk- ¼v-fu-½ izdj.k] Vksad esa QkStnkjh vihy la[;k 02@2013 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 19-08-2015 ls fujLr djus ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
fuxjkdkj@vfHk;qDr ykMw jke cSjok ds eR;q izek.k&i= dh izfr e; eR;q rLnhd izkIr gks pqdh gS] ftlds vuqlkj mldh e`R;q fnukad 13-01-2020 dks gks pqdh gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:6442]
[CRLR-1357/2015]
(2 of 2)
,slh fLFkfr esa bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk esa dksbZ dk;Zokgh 'ks"k ugha jgrh gSA blh vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA varfje izkFkZuk&i= ;fn dksbZ gks rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
NIMIT GOYAL /77
LADU RAM BAIRWA
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court