This is an order in a Criminal Revision Petition challenging a High Court order. The CPI-JWP interpreted the impugned order as erroneous, erroneous, and without any infirmity or flaw. The petition was dismissed.
Petition dismissed as the impugned order was not erroneous, erroneous, and without any infirmity or flaw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:35309]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 106/2004
Abdul Rauf s/o Shri Abdul Gaffar, r/o Prince Medicos, Char Darwaja Road and Ramganj Bazar, Purana Police Station Kai Samne and at Present resident of Maniharon Ka Rasta, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M M Ranjan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yashwardhan Tolani For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
03/09/2025
fuxjkuhdkj dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh fo}ku ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] dze&1] t;iqj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 09-01-2004 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk fuxjkuhdkj&izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuki= vUrxZr /kkjk 126¼2½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk fujLr fd;k x;k gSA
fuxjkuh ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd fuxjkuhdkj }kjk ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; ds le{k ,d izkFkZuki= vUrxZr /kkjk 126¼2½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk bl vk'k; dk izLrqr fd;k x;k fd xSjfuxjkuhdkjku~ dh vksj ls fuxjkuhdkj ds fo:) /kkjk 125 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dk izkFkZuki= izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] tks tokc gsrq fnukad 12-03-2003 dks fu;r Fkk] ijUrq mDr frfFk dks fuxjkuhdkj chekj gksus
[2025:RJ-JP:35309]
[CRLR-106/2004]
(2 of 3)
ds dkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr ugha gqvk vkSj vius HkkbZ dks gkftjh ekQh izkFkZuki= ds lkFk U;k;ky; esa Hkstk] ijUrq U;k;ky; us izkFkZuki= Lohdkj ugha fd;k vkSj fuxjkuhdkj ds HkkbZ dks vkxs dh is'kh 01-04-2003 crk nhA tcfd okLro esa fnukad 12-03-2003 dks fuxjkuhdkj ds fo:) ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh djrs gq, fnukad 01-04-2003 dks vafre vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;k] tks fof/k fo:) gSA vr% mDr vkns'k vikLr fd;k tkosA
fuxjkuh ds laca/k esa lquk x;kA
fuxjkuhdkj ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us fuxjkuh esa vafdr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, izdV fd;k fd ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; us fnukad 12-03-2003 dks fuxjkuhdkj ds chekj gksus ds dkj.k mldh gkftjh ekQh gsrq mlds HkkbZ }kjk izLrqr izkFkZuki= dks vLohdkj djrs gq, fnukad 01-04-2003 dh is'kh crk nh rFkk fnukad 01-04-2003 dks vafre vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;k] ftlds laca/k esa tkudkjh djus ij izdV gqvk fd U;k;ky; us fnukad 12-03-2003 dks fuxjkuhdkj ds fo:) ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh djrs gq, fnukad 01-04-2003 dks vkns'k ikfjr dj fn;k] tks vuqfpr ,oa fof/k fo:) gSA
izLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA fo}ku ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; }kjk vkykSP; vkns'k fnukad 09-01-2004 bl vk/kkj ij ikfjr fd;k gS fd fnukad 12-03-2003 dks /kkjk 125 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh i=koyh tokc ds fy, fu/kkZfjr Fkh] ftl fnu fuxjkuhdkj ugha U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr ugha vk;k vkSj vius chekj gksus laca/kh u rks dksbZ esfMdy is'k fd;k vkSj u gh dksbZ ,slk izek.ki= izLrqr fd;k] ftlls izdV gksrk fd okLrfodrk esa og ,slh chekjh ls ihfM+r Fkk vkSj U;k;ky; esa ugha vk ldrk FkkA fo}ku ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 12-03-2003 ds i'pkr~ fnukad 01-04-2003 dks izdj.k dk vafre fu.kZ; fd;k x;k gS] bl chp Hkh fuxjkuhdkj tokc vFkok ,di{kh; dk;Zokgh lekIr djus dk vkosnu ns ldrk Fkk] ysfdu mldh vksj ls ,slk ugha fd;k x;kA blds i'pkr~ fuxjkuhdkj us /kkjk 126¼2½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izkFkZuki= ds nkSjku Hkh ,slk dksbZ tokc izLrqr fd;k tkuk nf'kZr ugha gS] tks og /kkjk 125 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izdj.k esa izLrqr djus ds fy, rRij jgk gksA mDr izdze ij Hkh fuxjkuhdkj ;g nf'kZr djus esa vlQy jgk gS fd fnukad 12-03-2003 dks og vLoLFk Fkk vkSj viuh
[2025:RJ-JP:35309]
[CRLR-106/2004]
(3 of 3)
vLoLFkrk ds dkj.k U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gks ldrk FkkA ,slh fLFkfr esa Li"V gS fd fo}ku ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; us fuxjkuhdkj dh vuqifLFkfr dk dksbZ mfpr dkj.k ugha ekurs gq, ldkj.k vkns'k fnukafdr 09-01-2004 ikfjr fd;k gS] ftlesa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ =qfV] dksbZ vuqfprrk ,oa voS/krk ugha gSA
ifj.kker% fuxjkuhdkj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh ;kfpdk lkjghu gksus ls fujLr dh tkrh gSA rn~uqlkj fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /01
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court Act, 1950, Section 126(2) procedure was correctly followed in issuing a notice and communicating the impugned order to the petitioner.
Whether the appeal was barred by Section 125 IPC due to the petitioner's absence on the relevant date from the High Court.
Whether the impugned order communicated on 09-01-2004 to the petitioner was erroneous, erroneous, and without any infirmity or flaw.
Abdul Rauf
State of Rajasthan
Mst. Firdosh Nisar
Neha Naz
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
