A criminal revision petition filed against a maintenance order was listed with no counsel or party present for either side. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous and in the absence of the petitioner and respondent, and also rejected any other pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19314]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1012/2007
Through his Mother- Neetu Chandel W/o Jagdish Chand Chandel, Resident of Near Motor Garrage, Jhalawar.
----Petitioners
Versus
Jagdish Chandel S/o Meghraj Chandel, Resident of Chear Ghar Ke Pas, Nagar Palika, Colony, Baran.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None Present. For Respondent(s) : None Present.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
07/05/2025
;kph i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA Hkj.k&iks"k.k ds vkns'k ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
vr% ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vuqifLFkfr o vfHk;kstu ds vHkko esa [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vU; dksbZ vkosnu ;fn yafcr gks] rks og Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition against the maintenance order remains live when the parties are absent.
Neetu Chandel
Lalchand @ Chirag (minor)
Jagdish Chandel
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
