This petition under Section 528 BNSS seeks fair investigation in an FIR involving IPC offences. The court directed the Superintendent of Police to hear the petitioner on a specified date per Sakiri Vasu.
Directed Superintendent of Police to hear petitioner on 15.07.2025 regarding fair investigation plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:24438]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8137/2024
Mahendra Meena Son Of Shri Radheyshyam, Resident Of Naharsinghpura, Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Abhinav Saxena with |
|---|---|
| Ms. Neha Garg | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP |
| Mr. Rishi RajSingh Rathore,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment
03/07/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:24438]
[CRLMP-8137/2024]
(2 of 2)
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Pooja /133
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to direct the police to consider a plea for fair and speedy investigation under Section 528 of BNSS.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar PradeshFollowed¶14
Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Meena
State Of Rajasthan
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
