Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR under BNS 2023 based on mutual settlement and lack of criminal antecedents. The Court, relying on established principles, quashed the FIR.
FIR No.21/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District Jaipur City (East), Rajasthan, is quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:51798]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8126/2025
Vikash Meena S/o Ramkesh Meena, Aged About 22 Years, Permanent Address Village Manpur, Tehsil- Boli, District- Sawai Madhopur, Presently Residence- Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East), Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. PradeepMathur |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with |
| Mr. M.S. Shekhawat,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
19/12/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:51798]
[CRLMP-8126/2025]
(2 of 2)
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
LALIT MOHAN /627
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of BNS 2023 should be quashed upon settlement and compromise between parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.Referred¶20
2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.Referred¶20
AIR 1992 SC 604 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vikash Meena
State of Rajasthan
Ms. Leena Badsiwal
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
