Petitioner sought direction for fair investigation of an FIR citing bias. Court held that petition failed to specify reasons for apprehended bias and was filed years ago, so no interference was called for. Petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:44221]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 565/2020
Smt. Kamani @ Ishika Kansal W/o Shri Mukul Kansal, D/o Shri Mukelsh Varshney, R/o 9/107, Second Floor, Aravalivihar, Bhiwadi, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar, Adv. for Mr. Kapil Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
04/11/2025
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:44221]
[CRLMP-565/2020]
representation before the respondent No.4 pointing out his grievance and same shall be considered by the respondent No.4 in accordance with law.
(ANAND SHARMA),J
Jatin /18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition alleging bias in investigation warrants judicial interference?
Smt. Kamani @ Ishika Kansal
State Of Rajasthan
The Inspector General Of Police, Alwar Range
The Superintendent Of Police, Alwar
The Station House Officer, Police Station Bhiwadi
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
