High Court directed the trial court to decide the main petition under Section 125 CrPC within six months instead of interfering with the interim maintenance order. The trial court is free to ascertain a different quantum based on evidence.
Direct the trial court to decide the main petition under Section 125 CrPC within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JD:7655]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 5517/2024
Deependra Asarsa S/o Dhirendra Asarsa, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Rose View Bangloo, Kala Chapra, Abuparwat, Dist. Sirohi.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Pritam Solanki |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Vikram Rajpurohit, Dy.G.A. with Mr. Ravindra |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
06/02/2025
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JD:7655]
[CRLMP-5517/2024]
(FARJAND ALI),J
30-divya/-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order granting interim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC or direct the trial court to decide the main petition.
What time limit should the High Court impose on the trial court to decide the main maintenance petition.
Whether the trial court is bound by the interim order when deciding the main maintenance petition on merits.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Deependra Asarsa
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Manisha Asarsa
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
