Dismissed

Ranveer Singh Son of Madan Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 May 2025CRLMP/510/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of an FIR involving alleged commercial fraud. The Court held that evidence proved offences under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act and the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, indicating extensive scope affecting the public, thus rejecting the claim of a private commercial dispute.

What did the court decide?

Petition for quashing of FIR No.70/2023 dismissed; pending applications disposed of.

Ranveer Singh Son of Madan Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:19780]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 510/2025

¶4

Ranveer Singh Son Of Madan Lal, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Panalava, Tehsil Laxmangarh,police Station Balara, District Sikar (Raj). At Present Residing At House No. 103-B, Kateva Nagar, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

Jalesingh Son Of Harchand, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Vidhyak Nagar Chirawa, Jhunjkhunu (Raj).

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Avtar Singh for Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P.
		Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

¶12

Judgment

¶13

12/05/2025

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition is filed seeking quashing of FIR No.70/2023 registered on 08.02.2023 at Police Station Jhunjhunu for the offence under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. It is further submitted that dispute herein pertains to commercial transaction. Further, it is submitted that there is no ingredient of Section 420 IPC.

¶15

Per contra , learned counsel for the State has furnished the factual report and has submitted that the same reflects that forged/scam is committed by the company in a well planned manner, whereby, economically disadvantaged or vulnerable

[2025:RJ-JP:19780]

[CRLMP-510/2025]

(2 of 2)

individuals were allegedly duped into investing in real estate transaction/schemes, promising assured returns.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon perusal of factual report, this Court has noted that evidence collected during investigation proves the commission of an offence under the provisions of Section 4, 5 and 6 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978 and relevant provisions of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 in addition to offence alleged under IPC; that scope of fraud seems to be extensive, with many members of public potentially affected, thus, the same cannot be given a colour of commercial dispute or private dispute.

¶21

For the reasons stated above, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the present petition.

¶22

Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

¶23

Factual report is taken on record.

¶24

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶25

GAURAV/8

Ranveer Singh Son of Madan Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranveer Singh Son of Madan Lal, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chitranjan Patahk @ Bholu Son of Shri Rajendra Pathak, Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Kumar Son of Late Subhash Chand, Vs State of Rajasthan

Ankit Boradiya @ Ankit Jain Son of Shri Ashok Jain, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rukmani Nandan Sharma Son of Late Shri Laxmanswaroop Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramprakash Son of Shri Bhanwarlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Narsingh Goyal @ Monu Son of Haridas, Vs State of Rajasthan