Petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel reported it had become infructuous; no substantive matter decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:18723]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4354/2014
Geeta D/o Shri Nihal about 15 years, through her natural guardian father Shri Nihal S/o Shri Jormal, R/o Village Ranf, P.S. Kaithwada, District Bharatpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajkumar Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
05/05/2025
It is informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-132
Geeta
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
