Dismissed¶15

Imran S/O Anwar Khan, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Nov 2025CRLMP/4141/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for want of prosecution; petition pending in defect side; failure to cure defects; petitioner lost interest; liberty to apply for revival; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.4141/2023; vehicle No. Rj-05-Bg-2145; Asst. Mining Engineer Sawai Madhopur; District Transport Officer Sawai Madhopur; SHO Police Station Malarna Donger; Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand; order dated 04/11/2025; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to move application for revival of the petition if any cause of action or grievance still survives ¶15

Imran S/O Anwar Khan, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.4141/2023

¶3

Imran S/o Anwar Khan, R/o Khanu, Roopwas, Bharatpur Through Power Of Attorney Holder Ibrahim S/o Sabudeen, Aged About 35, R/o Santa Ki Bagichi, Gangapur City, Swai Madhopur, (Rajasthan), Owner Of Vehicle No. Rj-05-Bg-2145.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p., Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench Jaipur.

¶7

Asst. Mining Engineer, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 3. District Transport Officer, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 4. Station House Officer (S.h.o.), Police Station Malarna Donger, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj).

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Nonepresent
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta,PP

¶10

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶11

Order

¶12

04/11/2025

¶13

This petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioner to cure the defect(s).

¶14

It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter and he has lost interest in pursuing this matter.

¶15

In view of the above, the criminal misc. writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

¶16

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.

¶17

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶18

Karan/168

Imran S/O Anwar Khan, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imran S/O Anwar Khan, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manbhari Devi W/O Hanuman Sahay, Vs State of Rajasthan

D.M. Misra S/O Tumbanath Mishra, Vs State of Rajasthan

Datar Singh S/O Hanuman Sahay Jat, Vs State of Rajasthan

Gagan Mitra S/O Premprakash Mitra, Vs Rajesh Mendiratta, S/O Sh. Mohan Lal Mendiratta

Mahendra Singh Mehta S/O Shri Late Shri Laxmi Chan Mehta, Vs State of Rajasthan

Namo Narayan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.