Allowed

Ranjeet Son of Ratiram, v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Jul 2025CRLMP/3407/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to quash FIR No. 210/2025 under BNS sections arising from a mutual fight. Parties arrived at a compromise; complainant Virendra and other injured accepted the compromise before the Court. Holding the alleged offences not serious in nature, the High Court quashed the FIR and all consequent proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 210/2025 of Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur and all consequential proceedings quashed.

Ranjeet Son of Ratiram, Vs the State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:24946]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3407/2025

¶4

Ranjeet Son Of Ratiram, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶5

Uttam Son Of Ratiram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶6

Bharat Son Of Ratiram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶7

Mukesh Son Of Manik, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶8

Gourav Son Of Mukesh, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.)

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶12

Virendra Son Of Ramkaran, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Saidoli, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.).

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avatar Singh Mr. Kapil Nagayach Mr. Kuldeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Ms. Seema Shekhar

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶16

Order

¶17

07/07/2025

¶18

;kfpdkdrkZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds rgr ;g ;kfpdk iqfyl Fkkuk& uncbZ] ftyk& Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 210@2025 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 125] 351¼2½] 332¼c½] 189¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk dks vikLr dj mlls mnHkwr leLr dk;Zokgh dks jnn djus gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:24946]

[CRLMP-3407/2025]

(2 of 3)

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kfpdkdrkZx.k dk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; ijLij le>kSrk gks x;k gSA bl lanHkZ esa ;kfpdkdrkZx.k }kjk ifjoknh izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 ohjsUnz }kjk fu"ikfnr jkthukek fnukad 27-05-2025 ,oa vU; vkgrx.k yPNhjke ,oa lksuw ls fu"ikfnr jkthukek fnukad 07-07-2025 izLrqr fd;k gSA mDr jkthukek fjdkWMZ ij ysus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ifjoknh }kjk ftu vijk/kksa ds lanHkZ esa tks izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ;kphx.k ds fo#) iathc) djkbZ xbZ gSa og xaHkhj izdfr ds ugha gSa vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; ijLij gq, jkthukes dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, mDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,oa mlls mnHkwr leLr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh dks jnn o vikLr dh tk,A

¶23

bl lanHkZ esa izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jherh lhek 'ks[kj mifLFkr gSa vkSj muds }kjk i{kdkjksa ds e/; ijLij jkthukek gksuk izdV fd;k x;k gS muds }kjk U;k;ky; ds le{k ifjoknh ohjsUnz dks igpku fd;k x;k gS vkSj lkFk gh ;g rF; Hkh mYysf[kr fd;k x;k gS fd izdj.k esa vU; vkgr yPNhjke o lksuw }kjk ;kphx.k ls vkt fnukad 07-07-2025 dks jkthukek dj fy;k x;k gS vkSj mDr jkthukes ij yPNhjke o lksuw ds gLrk{kj gSa vkSj mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ;fn ;kphx.k ds fo#) ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vikLr dh tkrh gS rks ifjoknh dks dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA

¶24

U;k;ky; ds le{k vkgr yPNhjke vkSj lksuw dks vf/koDrk Jherh lhek 'ks[kj us igpku fd;k gSA

¶25

fo}ku yksdvfHk;kstd }kjk mDr ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ;kphx.k }kjk izR;FkhZ la[;k 2 ohjsUnz ,oa vkgr yPNhjke o lksuw ds lkFk ekjihV dh xbZ gS vkSj blds QyLo:i mUgsa migfr;ka dkfjr gqbZ gSa rFkk ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr dk;Zokgh lekIr fd, tkus dk dksbZ U;k;ksfpr dkj.k ugha gSA

¶26

cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶27

izdj.k esa eq[; vkgr yPNhjke] lksuw o ohjsUnz vkSj ;kphx.k ds e/; ijLij jkthukek gksuk vfHkys[k ij vk;k gSA U;k;ky; ds le{k vkgrx.k

[2025:RJ-JP:24946]

[CRLMP-3407/2025]

(3 of 3)

yPNhjke ,oa lksuw us vkt fnukad 07-07-2025 dks fyf[kr esa jkthukek izLrqr fd;k gS vkSj og U;k;ky; esa O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr gSa vkSj mUgsa fo}ku vf/koDrk Jherh lhek 'ks[kj }kjk igpku fd;k x;k gSA mDr nksuksa vkgrx.k }kjk ;kphx.k ls jkthukek gksuk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS blh izdkj v;kph la[;k 2 ohjsUnz ftlds }kjk ;kphx.k ds fo#) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ iathc) djkbZ gS og U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gSa vkSj mlds }kjk Hkh ;kphx.k ls jkthukek gksuk Lohdkj fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl lanHkZ esa fnukad 27-05-2025 dks jkthukek fu"ikfnr djuk mYysf[kr fd;k gS vkSj mDr jkthukes ij vius gLrk{kj gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA

¶32

izdj.k esa ;kphx.k ds fo#) vkjksfir vijk/k /kkjk 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 125] 351¼2½] 332¼c½] 189¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk xaHkhj izdfr ds ugha gS vkSj u gh blds izHkko O;kid gSa] ;|fi i{kdkjksa ds e/; izdj.k ijLij ekjihV ls lanfHkZr gS bl lanHkZ esa mijksDr rF;ksa dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k esa vkgrx.k }kjk ;kphx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ls ijLij le>kSrk gks x;k gSA vr% mijksDr rF;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa ;kphx.k ds fo#) iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 210@2025] iqfyl Fkkuk& uncbZ] ftyk& Hkjriqj vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 125] 351¼2½] 332¼c½] 189¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk dks jn~n djuk mfpr le>rk gwaA

¶33

izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 210@2025] iqfyl Fkkuk& uncbZ] ftyk& Hkjriqj o mlls mn~Hkwr leLr nkafMd dk;Zokfg;ka lekIr fd, tkus ds vkns'k iznku fd, tkrs gSaA

¶34

mDr ;kfpdk mijksDr vuqlkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS ,oa izdj.k ls lacaf/kr izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] mDr ;kfpdk ds lkFk fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶35

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶36

RAMESHWAR PRASHAD /307

Ranjeet Son of Ratiram, v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Son of Ratiram, v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tinku @ Deva S/O Chandaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahiram S/O Prem Chand Vishnoi Vs Union of India

Naresh S/O Kalyan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ashok S/O Shriman Vs the State of Rajasthan

Guman Singh S/O Raghu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohan Kumar Care of Shri Yashodanand, Vs State of Rajasthan