Petitioner challenged the order rejecting his protest petition and quashing the FIR arising from a Section 138 NI Act matter. The court found the trial still pending, final report not concluded, and no illegality in the impugned orders; inherent powers were not attracted. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:6935]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 274/2025
Bhairumal Khatri S/o Late Shri Gagumal, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Plot No. 21, Purohitpada, Brahmpuri, Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
______________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : fe- 'kksHkk 'kekZ For Respondent(s) : Jh ekuosUnz flag 'ks[kkor] yksd vfHk;kstd Jh 'kqHke lSu] yksd vfHk;kstd _______________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order
17-02-2025
;kph@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g ;kfpdk vUrxZr /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- vihyh; U;k;ky; vij ftyk ,oa lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k dze&9] t;iqj egkuxj f}rh; }kjk nkf.Md fuxjkuh la[;k 96@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 13-12-2024 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA bl vkns'k }kjk fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V egkuxj eftLVªsV¼,uvkbZ-,DV izdj.k½ dze&01] t;iqj egkuxj f}rh; }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k&2767@2022 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 04-10-2024] ftlds }kjk ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= fnukafdr 29-04--2024 dks fujLr fd;k x;k gS] dks iq"V djrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fujLr dh xbZ gS A
lquk x;k A
;ksX; vf/koDRkk ;kph dk rdZ jgk gS fd i{kdkjku ds e/; /kkjk 138 ,u-vkbZ-,DV dk fopkj.k py jgk gS A ;kph@vfHk;qDr }kjk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k fnukad 29-04-2024 dks izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k fd ifjoknh }kjk tks 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS og xyr rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr gS vr% ifjoknh ds fo:) /kkjk 199 lifBr /kkjk 191 o 193 rFkk
[CRLMP-274/2025]
[2025:RJ-JP:6935]
(2 of 2)
209 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds v/khu dk;Zokgh dh tkosA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mDr izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k x;k gS rFkk ftlds fo:) dh xbZ fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Hkh fuxjkuh U;k;ky; }kjk fujLr dj nh xbZ gS A mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd bUgha leku rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij ifjoknh }kjk ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&164@2022 Hkh ntZ djok;h xbZ Fkh ftlesa vafre izfrosnu udkjkRed izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk orZeku esa izksVsLV fiVh'ku yafcr gS A mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd ifjoknh }kjk xyr rF;ksa ij 'kiFk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS vr% ;kph ds fo:) dk;Zokgh lekIr dh tkos o ifjoknh ds fo:) dk;Zokgh dh tkosA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us fojks/k djrs gq, ;kfpdk fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;k A
geus nksuksa i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa o fordksZa ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA izdj.k esa vHkh fopkj.k yafcr gS A ;g Hkh izdV gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 164@2022 dk vafre :i ls fuLrkj.k ugha gqvk gS A ;g Hkh izdV gS fd ifjoknh i{k ls ;kph@vfHk;qDr }kjk vHkh rd ftjg ugha dh xbZ gS A fopkj.k U;k;ky; o fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us lHkh rF;ksa ij fopkj djrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd, gSa A vr% bu lHkh ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, mDr vk{ksfir vkns'kksa esa dksbZ fof/kd =qfV nf'kZr ugha gqbZ gSA /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l dh varfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx U;k;ky;hu o dkuwuh izfdz;k ds nq:i;ksx dks fuokfjr djus vFkok laiw.kZ U;k; mn~ns'; dh izkfIr ds fy, gh fd;k tk ldrk gS] ,slh ifjfLFkfr;ka bl izdj.k esa ugha gSA
vr% /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr izLrqr ;g ;kfpdk Lohdkj ;ksX; ugha gksus ls fujLr dh tkrh gSA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Rishikesh Soni/425
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere under Section 528 BNSS with the order rejecting the protest petition and quashing the FIR when the trial under Section 138 NI Act is pending.
Whether the complainant's affidavit was based on false facts warranting action against the complainant instead.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhairumal Khatri
State of Rajasthan
Rahees Ahmad
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
