Hon'ble Justice Praveer Bhatnagar, in this Criminal Miscellaneous petition, partially set aside the impugned judgment and order of the High Court and the Court of Sessions.
The judgment of the High Court and the order of the Sessions Court were set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19439]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2724/2025
Ganga Singh Son Of Shri Rajpal Singh, Resident Of Gram Pali, Tehsil - Goverdhan, District - Mathura. (U.p.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dileep Singh Jadaun For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order
08/05/2025
;kph xaxkflag dh vksj ls mDr ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk U;k;ky; vfrfjDr ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k ¼efgyk mRihM+u izdj.k½ Hkjriqj }kjk vkijkf/kd fuxjkuh la[;k 01@2021 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 05-02-2025 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
fo}ku~ vf/koDrk ;kph dk rdZ gS fd lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk tks vkns'k fnukad 05-02-2025 ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] og mfpr ugha gSA mDr VªSDVj ;kph }kjk fcy ¼,usDlpj&6½ }kjk [kjhn fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj ;kph mDr VªSDVj dk iathc) Lokeh gSA
lacaf/kr fuxjkuh U;k;ky; ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk bl lanHkZ esa v;kph la[;k 2 dks fookfnr VªSDVj dh lqiqnZxh iznku dh xbZ gS] tcfd v;kph la[;k 2 }kjk izLrqr rFkkdfFkr nLrkost dh lR;rk lafnX/k gS vkSj mldh vis{kkd`r ;kph }kjk izLrqr fcy ¼,usDlpj&6½ ls ;g Li"V gS fd fookfnr VSªDVj ;kph ds }kjk mldk fookg gksus ds mijkar uxn jkf'k nsdj [kjhn fd;k x;k gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa fuxjkuh U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:19439]
[CRLMP-2724/2025]
vkns'k fnukad 05-02-2025 ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 23-12-2020 vikLr fd;k tk,A
cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa gh U;k;ky;ksa us i{kdkjksa ds }kjk izLrqr vfHkys[kh; nLrkost dks voyksdu djus ds mijkar fookfnr VªSDVj fookg ds iwoZ v;kph la[;k 2 ds firk }kjk ;kph xaxkflag ds uke ls [kjhn djuk ekuk gS vkSj mlds vk/kkj ij mDr okgu dh lqiqnZxh v;kph la[;k 2 dks dh xbZ gSA bl lanHkZ esa ;kph ds fo#) tks izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ izLrqr gqbZ gS] mlesa vk;kph la[;k 2 dk ;gh vk{ksi jgk gS fd mDr VªSDVj ngst ds QyLo:i v;kph la[;k 2 ds firk }kjk ;kph dks fn;k x;k Fkk vkSj blh ifjisz{; esa mDr VªSDVj iqfyl }kjk vuqla/kku ds izØe ij tCr fd;k x;k gSA
fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k ds i`"B la[;k 4@5 esa ;g mYysf[kr fd;k gS fd%&
^^tgka rd fuxjkuhdrkZ ds bl rdZ dk iz'u gS fd mlus rks 'kknh gksus ds i'pkr fnukad 24-11-2010 dks ;g VªSDVj [kjhnk Fkk] bl laca/k esa fo}ku~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k tks xSjfuxjkuhdrkZ la[;k 2 dh vksj ls vkjVhvkbZ esa izkIr fd;s x;s nLrkostkr dh QksVksizfr;ka izLrqr dh xbZ gSa] mudk voyksdu djus ls QkeZ uacj 21 esa fookfnr VªSDVj dh fnukad 10-10-2010 dks xaxkflag dks fMyhojh gksus dk rF; vafdr gksuk lkeus vk jgk gS rFkk Jh [k.Msyoky VªSDVlZ }kjk xaxkflag ds uke tkjh fcy tks 10-10-2010 dks tkjh gqvk gS] lkeus vk jgk gSA**
vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa tc nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa }kjk mDr VªSDVj ds lanHkZ esa v;kph la[;k 2 ds firk }kjk ;kph ds uke ls fookg ls iwoZ mls fnukad 10-10-2010 dks [kjhn fd;k tkuk foosfpr fd;k x;k gSA rc ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr lekukarj QkbafMaXl ds vk/kkj ij ;g U;k;ky; mDr vkns'k esa gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ U;klaxr dkj.k ugha ikrk gSA
vr% mDr ;kfpdk lkjghu gksus ls vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
MOHIT/ 53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judgment of the High Court and the Court of Sessions should be quashed to set aside the conviction of the petitioner under Section 304 IPC?
Ganga Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Jasoda
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
