Allowed¶22

Sunil @ Machiya S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Jul 2025CRLMB/950/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur) bail-grant order dated 10/07/2025 by Justice Uma Shanker Vyas; CRLMB 950/2025; petitioner Sunil @ Machiya s/o Babulal (Central Jail Kota); FIR No. 186/2024, PS Simliya, District Kota Rural; offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 110; application under BNSS Section 483 allowed; personal bond Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each; custody since 19-12-2024; injured person discharged from hospital 08-12-2024; bail granted without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two reliable sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, appear on the court's fixed dates and whenever summoned, and be released unconditionally on bail provided his attendance is not otherwise required in any other case. ¶22

Sunil @ Machiya S/O Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner/accused's bail application under Section 483 BNSS (seeking regular bail for himself in respect of FIR No. 186/2024, PS Simliya, District Kota Rural) should be accepted.

¶13

Court's answer

The court accepted the petitioner/accused Sunil @ Machiya s/o Babulal's bail application.

¶22

Ratio / Principle

Release directed on condition that the petitioner furnishes a personal bond of Rs. one lakh and two reliable sureties of Rs. fifty thousand each, presents them within the discretion of the learned consideration court on fixed dates and whenever summoned to attend, and, provided his presence is not otherwise needed in any other case, he be released unconditionally (without restriction) on bail.

¶22

Key takeaways

Considering the factual position available in the case, the submissions of both sides, the period of the accused's detention, and the likelihood that further consideration of the case will take time, the court deemed it appropriate to accept the bail application without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case at this stage.ratio¶21

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur bench (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas), order dated 10/07/2025 on S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 950/2025: bail application of petitioner Sunil @ Machiya s/o Babulal, lodged under Section 483 BNSS in respect of FIR No. 186/2024 of Police Station Simliya, District Kota Rural (offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2) and 110 BNS), was allowed despite the public prosecutor's opposition, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case at this stage. Taking into account the accused's detention since 19-12-2024, the discharge of the injured person from hospital on 08-12-2024 after treatment, and the time further consideration of the case was expected to take, bail was granted on the petitioner furnishing a personal bond of Rs. one lakh and two reliable sureties of Rs. fifty thousand each, presenting them on fixed court dates and attending whenever called, with unconditional release if his presence is not otherwise required in any other case.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:25498]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 950/2025

¶4

Sunil @ Machiya S/o Babulal, R/o Behind Pawer House, Shanti Nagar, Police Station Simliya, District Kota Rural (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajveer Singh Rajawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

10/07/2025

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= ch ,u ,l ,l dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk lhefy;k] ftyk dksVk xzkeh.k esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&186@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 126¼2½] 115¼2½] 189¼2½] 110 ch ,u ,l esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vkjksi yxk;s x;s gSa] ijarq vkgr vkseizdk'k ih-MCY;w-&2 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gks pqdk gS ftlus flj ij izk.k?kkrd pksV ckcwyky }kjk igqapkus dk vkjksi yxk;k gSA ckcwyky dks iqfyl us vfHk;qDr ugha ekuk gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 19-12-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ,d lkekU; vijk/k ds vfrfjDr vU; dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gS] egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku gks pqds gSaA izdj.k ds 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

[2025:RJ-JP:25498]

[CRLMB-950/2025]

(2 of 2)

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶20

orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij vkgr ds lkFk ekjihV dj flj ij izk.k?kkrd pksV igqapkus dk vkjksi gSA fpfdRlk ds mijkar fnukad 08-12-2024 dks vkgr dks vLirky ls fMLpktZ fd;k tk pqdk gSA

¶21

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk dh vof/k ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lquhy mQZ efN;k iq= ckcwyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶23

( UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Murari Lal Sharma /70

Sunil @ Machiya S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil @ Machiya S/O Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajid Mohd. Vs State

Banwari Lal Takar S/O Shri Narayan Takar Vs Hanuman Prasad Jakhad S/O Shri Mansharam

Govind Narain Vs State

Vijaypal @ Falya Son of Bhagwanaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Prakash @ Vin Sharma S/O Late Sh. Omprakash Sharma Vs State of Rajsthan

Vinod Prakash @ Vin Sharma S/O Late Sh. Omprakash Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan