Chirag Yadav S/O Rampal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

[2025:RJ-JP:33012]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8114/2025

Saurabh Sethi Son Of Rajesh Sethi, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of 59, In Front Of Temple, Jaitpura Anatyapura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ( Presently Confined In Jail At Bharatpur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8115/2025 Suraj Meel S/o Rajendra Meel, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of V-116 Rajawas Amer, Jaipur, Police Station Harwada, District Jaipur (Raj.) ( Presently Accused Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8506/2025 Sunil Kumar S/o Naresh Kumar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. 17, Gali No. 3, Saraswati Vihar Basti, Kalka Marg, Gharuheda Chungi, District Rewari (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur).

¶16

----Petitioner

¶17

Versus

¶18

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶19

----Respondent

¶20

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8508/2025 Chirag Yadav S/o Rampal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No. 3, Krishna Flour Mill, Todapur, Hailimandi, District Gurgaon (Haryana). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶21

----Petitioner

¶22

Versus

¶23

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶24

----Respondent

¶25

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8509/2025 Dinesh Rajwaniya S/o Murlidhar Rajwaniya, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Josiyon Ka Mohalla, Jaitpura, Tehsil Chomu, Anatyapura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At Central Jail Bharatpur).

----Petitioner

Versus

[2025:RJ-JP:33012]

[CRLMB-8114/2025]

(2 of 5)

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶32

----Respondent

¶33

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8510/2025

¶34

Samir Suthar S/o Anil Suthar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o 661, Near Vishwakarma Temple, Rishabhdev, Udaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At Central Jail Bharatpur).

¶35

----Petitioner

¶36

Versus

¶37

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶38

----Respondent

¶39

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8511/2025 Amit Babal S/o Dharmpal Babal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o C 25 B, 4 C Scheme, V.k.i. Area, Loha Mandi Road Macheda, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Bharatpur).

¶40

----Petitioner

¶41

Versus

¶42

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶43

----Respondent

¶44

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10489/2025

¶45

Hemraj Rangera S/o Shri Sohan Lal Rangera, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Baliyo Ka Mohalla, Turkiyas, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Bharatpur).

¶46

----Petitioner

¶47

Versus

¶48

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶49

----Respondent

¶50

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Chanchal & Mr. Utkarsh Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Kapil Gupta Mr. Kunal Sharma Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore Mr. Sanjay Khedar Mr. Vikram Shishwal Mr. Shekhar Singh
For Respondent(s)		Mr. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Sharma

(3 of 5)

[2025:RJ-JP:33012]

[CRLMB-8114/2025]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order

¶55

21/08/2025

¶56

This instant applications for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Saurabh Sethi Son Of Rajesh Sethi, Suraj Meel S/o Rajendra Meel, Sunil Kumar S/o Naresh Kumar, Chirag Yadav S/o Rampal Singh, Dinesh Rajwaniya S/o Murlidhar Rajwaniya, Samir Suthar S/o Anil Suthar, Amit Babal S/o Dharmpal Babal, Hemraj Rangera S/o Shri Sohan Lal Rangera in FIR No. 165/2025 dated 13.05.2025 registered at P.S. Kotwali Bharatpur District - Bharatpur whereby the applicants-accused were charged under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act.

¶57

The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.

¶58

Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for applicants submits that the matter pertains to offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act and now the parties have settled their dispute as complainant is compensated by additional payment of ₹12,00,000/- in addition to ₹10,00,000/- recovered during investigation by police. They submits that nothing survives in this matter as the offence under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS are compoundable under the law. They also

(4 of 5)

[2025:RJ-JP:33012]

[CRLMB-8114/2025]

submitted that the police has already filed a charge-sheet and disposal of the case will take its own time.

¶63

Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for complainant submits that he has received ₹22,00,000/- lost during transaction with accused and he has no objection in case bail is granted to these petitioners accused.

¶64

Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record.

¶65

Having considering the submissions and also considering the material placed on record, I am of the considered view that the parties have settled their dispute and the dispute pertains to private nature. A charge-sheet has been filed after investigation.

¶66

Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused.

¶67

Thus, the instant bail applications filed on behalf of applicants-accused Saurabh Sethi Son Of Rajesh Sethi, Suraj Meel S/o Rajendra Meel, Sunil Kumar S/o Naresh Kumar, Chirag Yadav S/o Rampal Singh, Dinesh Rajwaniya S/o Murlidhar Rajwaniya, Samir Suthar S/o Anil Suthar, Amit Babal S/o Dharmpal

(5 of 5)

[2025:RJ-JP:33012]

[CRLMB-8114/2025]

Babal, Hemraj Rangera S/o Shri Sohan Lal Rangera , are hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:-

¶72

(i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.

¶73

(ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.

¶74

(iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court.

¶75

(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be

¶76

canceled.

¶77

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.

¶78

(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J

¶79

CHETNA BEHRANI /96-103

Chirag Yadav S/O Rampal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chirag Yadav S/O Rampal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammad Islam Bhati S/O Kabir Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Sharma @ Kanda S/O Shri Roop Kishore Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Nahar Singh S/O Shri Kajod Harijan Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Babal S/O Dharmpal Babal Vs State of Rajasthan

Madalla Shriniwas Son of Shri Venkatshwar Rao, Vs Union of India

Subhash S/O Bhanwar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan