Allowed

Mahender S/O Bhanwar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Feb 2025CRLMB/720/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 439 CrPC for an accused in an FIR under Sections 8/29 NDPS Act. Court noted custody since April 2024 and trial likely to take long; without commenting on merits, it allowed bail subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner enlarged on bail: personal bond Rs.50,000 plus two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Mahender S/O Bhanwar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:6087]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 720/2025

¶4

Mahender S/o Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Netda, Police Station Karwad, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Is Confined In Central Jail, Jodhpur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Bishnoi Mr. Rishabh Bhidasra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶10

Order

¶11

12/02/2025

¶12

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C./483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.103/2021 registered at Police Station Mangliawas, Ajmer for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 8/29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 04.04.2024. Counsel further submits that no recovery has been made from the petitioner and was not present at the spot at the time of incident. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and

[2025:RJ-JP:6087]

[CRLMB-720/2025]

(2 of 2)

he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶19

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record.

¶20

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, the bail application is allowed . The accusedpetitioner namely Mahender S/o Bhanwar Lal , shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶22

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶23

SAURABH /26

Mahender S/O Bhanwar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahender S/O Bhanwar Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harveer Singh S/O Om Prakash Jat, Vs Ghanshyam Verma S/O Khairuram Verma

Ganesh Bawariya S/O Sardar Bawariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Union of India Vs Roshanlal Jaat S/O Shri Ghisu Lal

Pramesh Kumar Tayal Son of Late Shri Shobha Ram Tayal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Akhil Agarwal S/O Late Shri Vikram Agarwal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Hanuman Ram S/O Ramlal Vs State of Rajasthan