Allowed¶22

Faizul Ansari S/O Munne Ansari v. State of Rajasthan

Bail – NDPS Act – Section 483 BNSS

Rajasthan HC14 May 2025CRLMB/6480/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

NDPS bail Jaipur; Section 8/21 NDPS Act offence; bail application under Section 483 BNSS; FIR No.0154/2025 PS Sanganer Jaipur City (East); contraband below commercial quantity; no criminal antecedents; custody since 07.04.2025; Central Jail Jaipur; personal bond Rs.50,000/-; two sureties Rs.25,000/- each; bail granted without opinion on merits; High Court of Rajasthan Jaipur Bench; Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur; decided 14/05/2025; CRLMB-6480/2025.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioner Faizul Ansari on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial. ¶22

Faizul Ansari S/O Munne Ansari Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, an accused in FIR No.0154/2025 (Police Station-Sanganer, District-Jaipur City (East)) charged for the offence under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act, should be released on bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶13

Court's answer

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, the Court was inclined to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

The bail application under Section 483 BNSS was allowed; the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, and to appear before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail - NDPS Act - Section 483 BNSS - Rajasthan HC (Jaipur Bench), single-judge order dated 14/05/2025 (Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur) in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6480/2025 (CRLMB-6480/2025): bail granted to Faizul Ansari, accused in FIR No.0154/2025, Police Station-Sanganer, District-Jaipur City (East), for offence under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act. Counsel submitted the contraband was below commercial quantity and the petitioner had no criminal antecedents; petitioner in custody since 07.04.2025. Court granted bail on consideration of rival submissions and material on record, expressly without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case. Conditions: personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court, with appearance before that Court on all dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:20434]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6480/2025

¶4

Faizul Ansari S/o Munne Ansari, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Jua Jawahar Pur Post Mohammadpur, Police Station Shergarh, District Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Presently Residing At Near Bhomiya Ji Ke Chabutre, Sanganer, Poice Station Malpura Gate Jaipur East ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Special P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rajat Singh Solanki
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Onkar Singh Rajpurohit,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶11

Order

¶12

14/05/2025

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0154/2025 registered at Police Station-Sanganer, District-Jaipur City (East) for the offence under Section 8/21 of the NDPS Act.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that so called contraband is below the commercial quantity and there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 07.04.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may

[CRLMB-6480/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:20434]

(2 of 2)

be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner -Faizul Ansari S/o Munne Ansari shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶24

Anil Sharma/26

Faizul Ansari S/O Munne Ansari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Faizul Ansari S/O Munne Ansari v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neetu @ Bhavesh Prajapat W/O Late Devendra @ Ramavatar Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaisingh S/O Shri Vijay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijendra Singh S/O Shri Hari Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Smt. Santi Devi W/O Jagdish Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranjeet S/O Kishorilal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Christina Dass Vs State Anmd Anr.