Allowed¶28

Deepak S/O Mahendersingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Aug 2025CRLMB/6457/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Deepak Sandeep bail Rajasthan HC Jaipur 08/08/2025 Justice Praveer Bhatnagar; CRLMB 6457/2025 9112/2025 connected; FIR 75/2025 PS Kaithwara Deeg; BNS 191(2) 191(3) 190 121(1) 132 109(1) 310(2); Public Property Damage Prevention Act s.3; Section 483 BNSS bail application; charge-sheet submitted; custody since 22.04.2025; no criminal antecedents; personal bond Rs. 50,000 two sureties Rs. 25,000 each; bail granted merits not commented; State of Rajasthan respondent PP Shree Ram Dhakar.

What did the court decide?

Both bail applications allowed; accused-petitioners Deepak and Sandeep enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge, with an undertaking of appearance on all hearing dates. ¶28

Deepak S/O Mahendersingh Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶28

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused-petitioners, arrested in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 (Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg) for offences under BNS ss. 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1), 310(2) and s. 3 of the Public Property Damage Prevention Act, are entitled to release on bail under Section 483 BNSS.

¶19

Court's answer

Having regard to the arguments advanced, custody of the accused-petitioners since 22.04.2025, the likelihood that the trial will take considerable time, and the absence of criminal antecedents, the court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail, expressly without commenting on the merits of the case.

¶27

Ratio / Principle

Both named accused-petitioners (Deepak and Sandeep) shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge, undertaking appearance before the court on all dates of hearing and as called upon.

¶32

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan HC (Jaipur Bench), order dated 08/08/2025 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Praveer Bhatnagar: two connected bail applications under S. 483 BNSS (CRLMB Nos. 6457/2025 – Deepak s/o Mahendersingh – and 9112/2025 – Sandeep s/o Kamal Singh) arising from FIR No. 75/2025, P.S. Kaithwara, District Deeg, for offences under BNS ss. 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1), 310(2) and s. 3, Public Property Damage Prevention Act, were ALLOWED. Both accused enlarged on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge, in view of their custody since 22.04.2025, the expected delay in trial and absence of criminal antecedents, expressly without comment on the merits. Charge-sheet had already been submitted. Counsel's submissions on the nature of injuries and non-applicability of S. 109 BNS were noted but not adjudicated. No precedent relied upon; no impugned prior judicial order involved.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:30760]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6457/2025

¶4

Deepak S/o Mahendersingh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Matuki, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Deeg).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9112/2025 Sandeep S/o Kamal Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Matuki, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary Ms. Pooja Dixit Mr. Surendra Singh Mr. Anoop Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶17

Order

¶18

08/08/2025

¶19

These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accusedpetitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(1), 132, 109(1)

[2025:RJ-JP:30760]

[CRLMB-6457/2025]

(2 of 3)

and 310(2) of BNS and Sections 3 of Public Property Damage Prevention Act.

¶24

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the injuries sustained to injured Mahendra Singh, Head Constable at his head was found to be simple sharp in nature. The injury sustained to other constable Jagan Singh was found to be simple blunt in nature. Prima facie offence under Section 109 of BNS is not made out against the petitioners. The charge-sheet has already been submitted against the accusedpetitioners and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since 22.04.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time. therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

¶25

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record.

¶26

Heard and perused the material available on record.

¶27

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 22.04.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accusedpetitioners on bail.

¶28

Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely:

[2025:RJ-JP:30760]

[CRLMB-6457/2025]

(3 of 3)

1. Deepak S/o Mahendersingh, 2. Sandeep S/o Kamal Singh, in connection with FIR No. 75/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶33

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶34

ashu /119-120

Deepak S/O Mahendersingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak S/O Mahendersingh v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parvej Alias Pabbi S/O Juhru Vs State of Rajasthan

Mijaj Urf Mijju S/O Deenu Vs State of Rajasthan

Shakeel Mohammad S/O Iqbal Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Mubarik S/O Samsu Vs State of Rajasthan

Kirodi S/O Shri Jagan Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Das S/O Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan